Well, I’m sure Thom Browne finds it attractive…..

I guess if I had to model that crap, I too would be wearing a mask

Yo SeanJohn betta watch out

And the designer came out in person to acknowledge he had created those messes? Wow — he must be really brave.  I hated every single piece in this collection.  I can’t imagine seeing any of them being worn on the street by anyone! Hip waders? Really?

i wish there was more men only fashion shops and not just shops that have a menswear dept.

The shoes looks nice.

i still don’t understand what the point of even creating these … “clothes” is, to begin with.

i’m talking about “real world” applications.

not some Hollywood Fantasy Movie, or similar•such-as-that.

Not interesting at all.  Next!

Instead of writing it off as ugly why not read the reviews to get a sense of where the designer was going, as well as a sense of the mise en scene and then think about it? In the context of the theme (and as a cohesive collection) it’s actually very sophisticated and interesting. Moreover, if you look at individual pieces a lot of it isn’t entirely insane. Furthermore, the masks clearly reference fetish gear and I don’t see too many people here whining about fetish gear when there’s a half naked man involved. A lot of intellectual fashion questions gender and sexuality and attempts to incorporate sexuality into daily life rather than compartmentalizing it. In my eyes, it’s a much healthier view. I don’t understand why people, and gays in particular seem to be so hellbent on putting things into boxes: life/sex, reality/fantasy, masculine/feminine etc. It seems sad to slap a label onto something because it’s confusing, abnormal or just doesn’t fit cleanly into a predefined box. Frankly, coming from a community who will wear chaps, bondage harnesses and jockstraps for a night on the town, I find this thread to be rather hypocritical…

and with all that said..
..would you deign wear these pieces, as part of your standard wardrobe, guy?