Last week at Manhunt headquarters, a colleague and I were discussing Sean Cody‘s recent wave of bareback scenes. He thought they were hot, because they allowed him to indulge in a fantasy (sex without a condom) that he’d never do in real life. I thought they were unnecessary, since watching Sean Cody’s impossibly gorgeous models is already a fantasy in itself. This wasn’t an argument so much as a mutual understanding. He was turned on by the scenes, while I would have been just as turned on if the models had used condoms.
This is my opinion on the matter, and I know there are plenty of porn viewers who’d disagree. On the other hand, I know there are plenty of porn viewers who are actively turned off by bareback scenes. Then there’s a whole other set of porn viewers who want to be turned off, but they can’t help that their dicks respond to the imagery. Peoples is peoples! I’m (still) not trying to jump up on a soapbox about this.
For today’s round of Fuck Vs. Fuck, I thought it would be an interesting experiment to take one of Sean Cody‘s hotter scenes with a condom (previously seen here) and place it against a Chaos Men scene without a condom. Which do you prefer? Are you basing your decision on whether or not the scene’s bareback, or does it have more to do with the chemistry and the performers’ level of attractiveness?
NOTE: We here at Manhunt Daily encourage you to make responsible decisions in your sexual activities, however you may interpret that. Please head over to Manhunt Cares for more information on safer sex techniques.