“I apologize to my fans for waiting so long to make this announcement,” Cody Cummings said in an exclusive press release from Next Door Studios. “You’ve all been so patient watching me expand my horizons and explore my sexuality onscreen, and while I’ve been hesitating to say this so long – because of all the haters – I feel the need to be honest with you. I am a proud, gay American.”
He continues:
“Ever since filming SHADOWKISS with Anthony Romero, things haven’t been the same for me. My straight and bi work began to feel like an obligation. My body ached for the touch of another man, the feeling of him deep inside of me… But how could I disappoint the millions of female fans of CodyCummings.com?
“After many sleepless nights, it dawned on me that I could still satisfy my loyal customers without sacrificing my integrity. You don’t have to be straight to have sex with a woman. I’m a performer through and through, and when life gives you lemons – you just have to perform.
“My latest scene (see attached images) showcases me making love to fellow Next Door Studios performer Joey Hard. In filming this, I hope you can see that I’ve truly evolved into an honest man, whose [sic] willing to share his passion with the world. Thank you for your time.”
Well, that post just wrote itself! I’ve turned comments off out of respect for Cody’s feelings—since you haven’t been very nice to him in the past—but I hope that one day we can all look back on this and discuss the courage it took for Cody to share these words with the world.
– Dewitt
Photo credit: Cody Cummings
Click through to see Cody and Joey in, um, action:
___________________________________________________________
NOTE: Everything in this post is a lie. All of it.
I cry b.s. on this.
I cry b.s. on this.
I cry b.s. on this.
Cody has total control of what he wants to do. If he actually legitimately doesn’t want to participate in anal sex with another man, he doesn’t have to! Like, it’s his body and he’s free to do what he wants. If he DOES want to do this, then he really needs to shoot it honestly instead of making it LOOK like he’s getting fucked. It’s just so ridiculous that he feels the need to hide that he’s being fucked. So many people would PAY to watch him get actually fucked, with actual video proof, not just some shadowy bullshit.
Cody Cummings is like the Kardashian’s Full of shit, but great PR people, Cody has been playing everyone along since day one. If you expect me to believe that one scene turned him gay. I like to sell you a bridge. He knew his time was up and he had to confess. The whole, i never would bottom to am bottoming alot now was all a plan. The writing is on the walls. Dont get me wrong Cody seem like a nice guy, but I dont like smoke blown up my ass!
Cody Cummings is like the Kardashian’s Full of shit, but great PR people, Cody has been playing everyone along since day one. If you expect me to believe that one scene turned him gay. I like to sell you a bridge. He knew his time was up and he had to confess. The whole, i never would bottom to am bottoming alot now was all a plan. The writing is on the walls. Dont get me wrong Cody seem like a nice guy, but I dont like smoke blown up my ass!
Cody Cummings is like the Kardashian’s Full of shit, but great PR people, Cody has been playing everyone along since day one. If you expect me to believe that one scene turned him gay. I like to sell you a bridge. He knew his time was up and he had to confess. The whole, i never would bottom to am bottoming alot now was all a plan. The writing is on the walls. Dont get me wrong Cody seem like a nice guy, but I dont like smoke blown up my ass!
i do have a question that i hope at least a few of you will answer for me, over time:
; h
in light of what we have seen cody do (on film), over the years, how exactly might his sexuality be classified/explained?
or, maybe i should instead inquire, can cody be considered a “functional heterosexual”?
i ask because i’m still trying to figure out how sexuality, and human psychology, work.
my answer to my own question continues to rely on my assumption and understanding (which could be flawed, of course) of what the “heterosexual identity” is, mixed in with my coinage of “functional -sexuality” (which, in my explanation here, is not covering “queerhood,” in order to avoid complicating this matter more than it already shall be…) —
a.) given the overwhelming complexity of sexuality (which, really, should never be classified into three or four neat little categories), i do believe that only a rare few people (no more than 1 – 7% of the population, during any one generation) can truly claim to be “99.9999 – 100%” straight or gay: for it’s only a matter of one’s finding one’s self being randomly presented with the right opportunity to be able to take advantage of the right circumstances, to find themselves unexpectedly deviating from their perceived norm
(and on some occasions, the encounter with the anomaly can act as the gateway to a-whole-nother way of living)
however, i also assume that people rarely go searching for those “opportunities”; nor, by definition, do they spend a significant portion of their lives even considering the possibility of that they may Deviate…
…so, for all intents and purposes, those individuals can proclaim “i’m gay, gurllll” or “i’m straight homie” without batting an eye.
i know there are people who, for at least 99.59% of their entire lives, will manage to not willingly nor knowingly interact, in an intimate or/and sexual(-ized) manner, with another person who does not fall in line with their gender (androgynous/FTM/hermaphroditic/MTF/trans-sexual/etc.) or sex (biological woman or man) preference.
(and, yes.. ..more often than not, i am sure that these people prefer not to ‘have dealings’ with those other individuals who aren’t “the original”.. ..for whatever colour of reasoning or rationale.)
thus, i feel it’s perfectly logical to cite those individuals as sound evidence that can back my assertions.
functional -sexuality applies to homosexuals and heterosexuals who do nothing to deviate from what the obvious definition of their respective sexualities is.
b.) which leads me back to the matter of my having to explain what i believe “heterosexual identity” is.. ..by highlighting some of what i believe what It isn’t: cody cummings, for instance.
cody also leads me to a grey area, because i’m about to declare “heterosexual dudes don’t do what cody does,” and i don’t care about whether cody does or doesn’t consistently attain any form of “internal positive feedback´´ from his activities.
That’s one of the intangibles though: whether or not one attains pleasure (sexual or otherwise) from their activity.
(what do you say about the woman who had only ever been fucked and eaten by guys {and enjoys it}, but also loved flicking her own bean to female imagery?
what do you say about the woman who prefers to “peg” men?)
however.. ..even if cody somehow is, in fact, only-barely holding back the urge to puke up all he had ate and drank, in the previous 96 hours, during every single one of his man-on-man scenes, the reality continues to remain that no one forces him to engage in these scenes (that are being broadcast for all to consume) that he constantly churns out; also, as i’ve stated elsewhere, if any random person not already familiar with cumming’s body of filmed sex work were to observe one of his man-on-man scenes, they will likely automatically conclude he’s gay (or bi, if they’re in a good mood); i also assume they’d definitely assert that “if this gentleman doesn’t enjoy what i just saw him doing, he’s not doing a good job of convincing me that he is of such a mind-set.”
the most important, defining prerequisite of functional heterosexuality is “don’t consistently: sexualize, be excessively/unusually intimate with.. ..or feel not-Platonic Love (i lack a better term for this abstract concept) for your own gender.”
isn’t it?
(can two guys, who feel a definitive sexual attraction for only women, look forward to, and cuddle + snuggle very closely in bed together when they sleep {with no sexual arousal ever occurring from this specific activity}, and still be considered straight?)
cody’s already long-passed the point of being “functionally heterosexual.”
hasn’t he?
so..
..what can we say about him?
what can we learn from him?
what more can i say?
i do have a question that i hope at least a few of you will answer for me, over time:
; h
in light of what we have seen cody do (on film), over the years, how exactly might his sexuality be classified/explained?
or, maybe i should instead inquire, can cody be considered a “functional heterosexual”?
i ask because i’m still trying to figure out how sexuality, and human psychology, work.
my answer to my own question continues to rely on my assumption and understanding (which could be flawed, of course) of what the “heterosexual identity” is, mixed in with my coinage of “functional -sexuality” (which, in my explanation here, is not covering “queerhood,” in order to avoid complicating this matter more than it already shall be…) —
a.) given the overwhelming complexity of sexuality (which, really, should never be classified into three or four neat little categories), i do believe that only a rare few people (no more than 1 – 7% of the population, during any one generation) can truly claim to be “99.9999 – 100%” straight or gay: for it’s only a matter of one’s finding one’s self being randomly presented with the right opportunity to be able to take advantage of the right circumstances, to find themselves unexpectedly deviating from their perceived norm
(and on some occasions, the encounter with the anomaly can act as the gateway to a-whole-nother way of living)
however, i also assume that people rarely go searching for those “opportunities”; nor, by definition, do they spend a significant portion of their lives even considering the possibility of that they may Deviate…
…so, for all intents and purposes, those individuals can proclaim “i’m gay, gurllll” or “i’m straight homie” without batting an eye.
i know there are people who, for at least 99.59% of their entire lives, will manage to not willingly nor knowingly interact, in an intimate or/and sexual(-ized) manner, with another person who does not fall in line with their gender (androgynous/FTM/hermaphroditic/MTF/trans-sexual/etc.) or sex (biological woman or man) preference.
(and, yes.. ..more often than not, i am sure that these people prefer not to ‘have dealings’ with those other individuals who aren’t “the original”.. ..for whatever colour of reasoning or rationale.)
thus, i feel it’s perfectly logical to cite those individuals as sound evidence that can back my assertions.
functional -sexuality applies to homosexuals and heterosexuals who do nothing to deviate from what the obvious definition of their respective sexualities is.
b.) which leads me back to the matter of my having to explain what i believe “heterosexual identity” is.. ..by highlighting some of what i believe what It isn’t: cody cummings, for instance.
cody also leads me to a grey area, because i’m about to declare “heterosexual dudes don’t do what cody does,” and i don’t care about whether cody does or doesn’t consistently attain any form of “internal positive feedback´´ from his activities.
That’s one of the intangibles though: whether or not one attains pleasure (sexual or otherwise) from their activity.
(what do you say about the woman who had only ever been fucked and eaten by guys {and enjoys it}, but also loved flicking her own bean to female imagery?
what do you say about the woman who prefers to “peg” men?)
however.. ..even if cody somehow is, in fact, only-barely holding back the urge to puke up all he had ate and drank, in the previous 96 hours, during every single one of his man-on-man scenes, the reality continues to remain that no one forces him to engage in these scenes (that are being broadcast for all to consume) that he constantly churns out; also, as i’ve stated elsewhere, if any random person not already familiar with cumming’s body of filmed sex work were to observe one of his man-on-man scenes, they will likely automatically conclude he’s gay (or bi, if they’re in a good mood); i also assume they’d definitely assert that “if this gentleman doesn’t enjoy what i just saw him doing, he’s not doing a good job of convincing me that he is of such a mind-set.”
the most important, defining prerequisite of functional heterosexuality is “don’t consistently: sexualize, be excessively/unusually intimate with.. ..or feel not-Platonic Love (i lack a better term for this abstract concept) for your own gender.”
isn’t it?
(can two guys, who feel a definitive sexual attraction for only women, look forward to, and cuddle + snuggle very closely in bed together when they sleep {with no sexual arousal ever occurring from this specific activity}, and still be considered straight?)
cody’s already long-passed the point of being “functionally heterosexual.”
hasn’t he?
so..
..what can we say about him?
what can we learn from him?
what more can i say?
Bullshit. You see no penetration in any of these “gay” videos and he certainly isn’t gay…just trying to get more $$$ from gays
Bullshit. You see no penetration in any of these “gay” videos and he certainly isn’t gay…just trying to get more $$$ from gays
Bullshit. You see no penetration in any of these “gay” videos and he certainly isn’t gay…just trying to get more $$$ from gays
The truth will eventually be revealed. Perhaps, it already has.
Personally, I don’t care what Cody’s sexuality is any longer…..I just wished he were truthful from the onset…..I have lost a little respect for him. I still take it for what it’s worth….it’s the porn industry…..Cody’s still pretty sexy to me…..and will probably be so for a long time. I guess, the idex.a of a “straight” man enjoying the feeling of another man is very appealing, for me.
I always wonder why ppl need to break this down to the umpteenth power.
There’s no set definition, scale or determining factor…etc. It is what it is…What it is – is fluid. Persons sexuality develops over a lifetime. Past, present, future, taught, learned, innate, external, internal, situational, occupational, religion, society, experience…all these things have an effect on the state of ones sexuality. Especially when not innate or given to the individual.
I think the best way to look at it is, from the start in its simplest form, removing everything we know or learned.
“If no one every said it was wrong” Meaning society, religion, etc…had no opinion or view on it. No external influence or power. I would guess, the majority would be bi sexual. There would always be the ones who preferred one over the other…
From the Greeks to the Romans to the Tribes of New Guinea spanning the entire animal Kingdom right down to insects.
Ive known many bisexual men, gay men, curious men. For the most part, a true bisexual man will see sex with a man as just that sex. The emotional part or the idea that sex is more than the physical act is not strong or part of the equation. Where as a gay man, sees sex as an extension of himself.
Bisexual men have an emotional attraction to women and sexual to men.
I know straight men, that have had relationships with a particular guy at some point in their life. However, had no interest in men other than that one guy. The sexual act or desire to do it. Doesn’t define the person. Its simply defines the act.
Dissecting a porn star (fantasy) is not going to provide you with anything that profound.
i see.
This part of Cody being straight and then the anticipation of seeing him kissing, sucking, eating ass and getting fucked is naturally all part of a PR campaign to get the most money out of him. On my part, I would love to see him doing all of the above and getting the shit fucked out of him by a stud with a thick ten inch cock. Love to see him thrashing, hollering and humping for real as he gets thoroughly fucked, see a big hard wet cock ramming his ass, seeing it all the way in with the guys balls slapping on his ass . Love to watch him blow his load with a cock up his ass and see him getting cummmm all over his face and in his mouth, licking his lips and relishing the load and then getting deep kissed by the guy who just fucked him and shot a load in his mouth and on his face. Now this I would really like to see and not some fake fuck scene like he has been in before.
Queer since day one.
that is simulated his dick is not inside the guy, all his scenes never show his dick in anyone but women
did your read what’s writen down the video idiot a fucking note
NOTE: Everything in this post is a lie. All of it.
Who CARES! I have read all the comments and I just think you all need a better understanding of life and business! Cody is a great looking guy. He has given many great performances and porn is his job. I don’t care if he is gay… I don’t care if he is expanding his market to a larger gay viewer! When you have any business and a consumer who is willing to buy you product you do not start off by limiting your clients or your appeal. You seek the best way to build and market your product (in this case cody’s hotness to women and men) and you make desisions that will grow you client base and business.
I have met many guys who have seen Cody and since moved out of the straight world into bisexual or even gay relationships. His ability to be sexy with men and women gave him an appeal that for filled a lot of needs in all communities.
Gay men enjoy the tease of a straight guy doing gay porn, it is a fantisy most of us have had. Women liked that he was was for filling a man on man action without crossing a line and the idea of a three-way with two men who can be in bed together and have some fun to. I know of a few straight guys who after seeing his video’s have come to enjoy rimming and anal play with their partners after viewing Cody.
All in all! why do you care what sexual statis he is or why is it anything important to you or your life? If you loved his looks and enjoyed his work then you should be happy. If he comes out as gay then score 100 points for another hottie who has come out as gay. If you believe it is a scam them again why do you care? All I see is that he will be doing more man on man porn and I am fine with that too.
I for one like his “work” his work being porn. I am happy that this smart sexy guy is out doing this kind of work that he loves to do and is successful at it. If you looking for more from him forget it! I am sure we only see just the sexual side of this man and just like you and I he has a whole other part of himself that you will never see on film.
Thanks Dan
P.S.
Feel free to post a comment. I only came to this site to read the story and will not be back to read them as I have to get back to my job and life.
KEEP DOING WHAT YOU DOING CODY AND HAVE FUN!
If Cody really wanted to get fucked, he would let us see the cock go in his hole and not have a top hump n rub his cock as if he is fucking. He is the kind of guy I would love to see gang raped by all the bottoms he has fucked.
Sorry guys! I have seen this film and Cody DOES NOT have sex with Joey. I even slowed the film down and brightened the image but there was nothing.
G-REX: I agree with blue. This is too convoluted a way of saying that you (a) don’t know how to classify Cody’s sexuality, (b) don’t care about his sexuality or (c) it is relevant either way. That said, I personally think Cody is hot but I am still waiting to actually see him have penetrative sex with another guy. I live in hope!
i say this respectfully: do not deny those individuals who may be interested in reading an extended passage the opportunity to do so, simply because what was said happens not to interest you, or doesn’t fall-in-line with your own views
for, what i did, those couple of years ago, was what some like to call “back up my claims.”
“tl;dr” was not an option for me, then.
and, until Society At Large finally makes it safe to be a “not-heterosexual,” brevity remains not an option, when discussing the impact that individuals like kevin has, on guys like you and me.
i know that sexuality is fluid — taking myself as an example.
i also don’t get what the problem is, in calling one’s self “bi-sexual,” when a person does sexual stuff with cis-gendered women and men (regardless of whether that person acted as “giver” or “receiver” with either), like kevin obviously has.
i am technically bi-sexual, though i have yet to personally interact with a woman (cis-gendered or F-t-M’d), in any way whatsoever.. ..and it still may be a long time before i act on my desire
none-the-less: i have no problems admitting i’m not entirely straight; so why does kevin feel the need to hold on to his “straight” label?
even to this day, i am willing to bet that the vast majority of heterosexual-identified individuals will never do anything sexual or intimate (especially for the purpose of achieving any sort of personal gratification) with someone their gender; a few might “experiment” once or twice just to see what it’s like, then go back to boning and bonding with the sex that’s destined for them to be with after deciding, “same-sex relations is not for me”
this fucker kevin has filmed sex scenes with quite a fair number of other guys, over the years..
..well, what if the situation was reversed, and you had some purported gay guy, who goes out of his way to ensure we all know he’s a proud cock-muncher and ass-fuckee, films several sex scenes with chicks?
scenes where he is banging the hell out of their snatches..
..
..or, well, i guess to make things a little analogous with kevin, scenes where chicks are only sucking on his penis, and he shoots on their faces?