To be perfectly honest, I’m not surprised YouTube yanked Andrew Christian‘s latest video “Pink Paradise” from their site. The models are wearing a style of the brand’s underwear called “Almost Naked”, featuring an “anatomically correct” pouch that showcases a very visible peen outline. I mean, really, based on what you see in the original/censored video, I could draw you an accurate depiction of each models’ dick.
With that said, it’s still not clear why this isn’t allowed on YouTube, but I was able to log on and see some woman’s extraordinarily graphic “water birth experience”… Wait, so it’s okay to show a baby getting yanked out of some chick’s vagina, but it’s not okay for a few male models to act slutty and shake their junk? I’m confused.
Let’s have Chip Tanner investigate this matter! In his quest for gender equality, I’m sure he wouldn’t mind exposing this double standard by pulling a baby out of his butt.
– Dewitt
Click through to watch the video and weigh in on the controversy:
ORIGINAL:
LETTER TO YOUTUBE (click for larger view):
UNRATED:
If you look you can naked “straight” men’s asses, womens naked asses, wet t-shirt contests that clearly show a , women’s nipples and more, very revealing swimsuits, and close up shots of “VVL” visible vagina lines which I think is more revealing than a VPL could ever be. As for most “main stream ” sites the posts that represent homosexuals or targeted towards are held to much more censorship the those for a straight target.
If the item is tagged as “Adult Content” then it should not be subject to censorship of any means. An adult should be able to choice and view what they want.
BTW, does any have the list of models, I know that Chip Tanner and Kurt Madison are in there, but what about the others.
This is ridic…
Love the posting and video of course 🙂
gr8 videos,youtube should be ashamed of them selfs
YouTube was afraid of the models’ “gay” cock size. The video left them feeling short-changed.
Time to tell you tube to take a flying F-ck !
we need to do same thing about it!!!! if we all do it we can chage it!!! lets all write to youtube!!!!! how we feel about it!!!!!!!!!!!!!
umm..
..what were the aforementioned links?
I can assure you that they were no more explicit than a woman’s “water birth experience”.
http://www.andrewchristianblog.com/2012/02/andrew-christian-open-letter-to-youtube.html
it woulda been nice if all the links’d worked..
..a couple were 404; a couple others, actually, have since been 86’d by YT.
at any rate, i do believe youtube was/is obviously making a distinction between “not-sexually_charged nudity” (sometimes—but not always—known as “`artistic´ nudity”), nudity depicted for the sake of being nude, and “erotically-charged nudity.”
(feel free to add the modifier “near” with the noun nudity if you’d like.)
basically, anything that can be interpreted as “arousing,” or “intentionally arousing” may be problematic, for that web•site.
hmm..
…obviously, some homophobe’d flagged the video.
i can only hope that the account holders of the other, hetero-targeted smut were also sanctioned, as andrew was.
Ok. I’ll be honest. I don’t like these underwear, or the last ones, but these are no worse than the other videos I’ve seen of women dancing in next to nothing, or even nothing outright. It’s not like the video tries to HIDE what it is, so I don’t see why Youtube is making such a big fuss about it. Seriously. The largest videosharing website on the internet, and it doesn’t want to let us share videos of underwear models, to catchy music? 😐 Their ads are worse.
What happened to Youtube? Are they living in the sixties? What models do Youtube want to wear a sexy underwear so as not to look lusty-a monkey? Per se, Lust is on the eye of the beholder.
mr massive dong is called miles davis moody.
http://www.manhuntdaily.com/files/Miles-Davis-Moody-male-model-1.jpg
http://www.manhuntdaily.com/files/Miles-Davis-Moody-male-model-10.jpg
Miles David Moody is 100% straight. He has a beautiful girlfriend.All the men like him are straight.No one gay man has a great body like him.