I've met some guys who were into water sports, but this case is just plain crazy! Alan Patton is serving a 60-day sentence for stealing urine from toilets and urinals to satisfy his out of control urine fetish. Paton, a registered sex offender (shocker right?), also led to a change of the law in the state of Ohio.
Since there were no specific charges for stealing pee, Patton received a 60-day sentence for "criminal mischief" but his case has led state legislators to create a new law. A bill passed in the Ohio Senate which banned "collect[ing] bodily fluids from another without their consent."
Patton's M.O was to place plastic wrap around toilets and cups in urinals, and then drink the urine that collected after the young boys left the restroom. Hmmm…. gross. This urolagnia fan should have stuck to willing adult partners, but at least we got a highly useless law out of it!
– Andy
Not many things gross me out but this is sick…I have a serious problem with the collections of “boys” urine and drinking of it. This person has a few screws loose.
I lost my boner.
ewww!!!!!!
Well it is kind of a useful law, after that whole trial with the woman who dug through that guy’s trash, found a condom with his semen in it used it to claim he raped her.
Um. Wouldn’t a law like that potentially prevent police from recovering DNA samples in some cases?
Exactly what i was thinking E-man. But if its like on a cup or a rock or a piece of paper that would hapen to just fall on said bodily fluids i dont think it would bring about any punitive action
But what about a rape kit? Collecting semen without the subject’s consent? Only a matter of time before some asshole gets off by using this law to claim evidence was collected in violation of the law.
I think he should be sent to mental institute and not jail. He needs some clinical help.
Agreed. Already a sex offender, he is highly likely to reoffend especially if he does not get help.
Not only is the law USELESS it is counter-productive… more criminals will get off on this law, as cops can no longer claim they can use DNA (from saliva or other bodily fluids) evidence collected from discarded soda cans, etc. in that state… that is, if I am understanding the law properly.
Sounds like room for some investigation.