The new Rolling Stone cover featuring Lady Gaga is exactly like the cover girl–weirdly intriguing, over the top, slightly gaudy, and lacking pants. In fact, she's missing more than pants, covered by nothing more than some carefully placed bubbles.
Is anyone else terrified? I'm pretty sure I'm going to have nightmares about naked Lady Gaga zombies rising from the dead and trying to splash me in the face with acidic pink bubbles. As Tyra Banks "fierce" as one could call this, it just seems like the wrong cover for an issue with "the hot list".
– Dewitt
I honestly don’t get the fuss over “Lady Gaga”. I’ve seen her all over the place, including a spot on “The View” of all places and frankly after hearing her sing, all I can think is “Lady, Gag Me”.
As for this RS cover? It’s a bubblegum-hued nightmare. What crack-head acid-tripping “stylist” thought giving the bitch a bad Toni home-perm and Betty Boop make-up job would somehow make for an appealing look? She looks like a revamping of ‘Magenta’ from a “Rocky Horror” remake.
LOL, Magenta!
She totally rocked those bubbles at White Party this year. Lady Gaga’s the shit.
I think that she is a very talented musician… She mixes many genres… And has some pretty good singing chops (amongst playing a series of instruments). She is better than say Britney that’s for sure! Come on, gays!
Lady GaGa JUMPED THE SHARK…LIKE WEEKS AGO!
God that hair will haunt my dreams for weeks.
I actually like lady gaga and think she has more talent than britney. But she needs to get her act together.
This crazy thing she calls “style” is most miss rather than hit and if she really wants to stay she needs to figure that out. We can only overlook so much.
Well it IS Rolling Stones and it is Lady GaGa.