The new trailer for The Hunger Games: Catching Fire has dropped. It’s got a lot of Jennifer Lawrence being determined, and Liam Hemsworth being shirtless and whipped (not as sexy as you might thing), and wow, the costumes on Elizabeth Banks and Stanley Tucci. But what we wanted, and needed, was newcomer Sam Claflin running about and looking sexy while fighting for his life. He plays Finnick Odair, the hotsy guy with the trident and the net that you’re supposed to think could be yet another dude for Kat to pine over. To pine over despite the fact that she’s fighting for her life! Seriously, how does this girl have time for man troubles when her life is in danger every 5 minutes? It boggles the mind!
So, there’s only some brief stuff with Sam Claflin, Josh Hutcherson has far too many clothes on as Peeta, and Gale is only sans top so he can be tortured. All of that combined with Stanley Tucci’s JACKED eyebrows means that the producers are really ignoring the gays.
Watch the new trailer for The Hunger Games: Catching Fire below.
– J. Harvey
Good – can’t stand his rodent face.
Yeh, the new guy is cute, but in my opinion, this is one of the sickest (and I don’t mean that in a good way) concepts for films directed at a teen audience I’ve ever seen, and I thought the first one totally sucked, so it won’t be hard for this one to be better. We’ve got people like those whackos who shot up Columbine and killed 20 young kids in Connecticut, and yet Hollywood thinks it’s a good idea to put out a series of films about kids hunting and killing other kids. That is beyond warped, in my opinion, and makes me feel totally enraged.
Agreed, and some of the biggest Hollywood anti-gun supporters make the most violent movies. Yes, I am talking about you Matt Damon. They are all a bunch of hypocrites!
You obviously haven’t read the books, furthermore you must not have the mental capacity to see a movie as more than what is on the screen. The Hunger Games is about a group of Kids that are forced to fight to the death under a totalitarian government, a government that uses the death of the children as an example to the rest of the country as they are forced to watch.
And that makes it okay? I saw the first movie. It sucked. And I know exactly what it’s about. I have a Masters degree in literature, and I can tell you flat out that “The Hunger Games” isn’t “literature” as I know it. It’s pop culture crap fed to the unknowing masses by Hollywood and Madison Avenue and the purveyors of video games from Silicon Valley. The problem is that the maniacs out there with the guns don’t have the capacity to see more than what’s on the screen and go into a school dressed like “The Joker” or Batman wielding their AK-47s and blow the heads off 20 innocent 6 year old children. It’s sick.
Dude you are on Manhunt looking to hookup with other guys…. and you choose this arena to clarify your opinion on literature. ok genius. This isn’t the new york times chat room.
P.S don’t talk about the Connecticut situation to back up your one sided flat point of view. You don’t live there, it was not your children. Leave the existence to violence and all explanation of it to nature and go get fucked, because you obviously need it.
You’re an idiot if you think that all the violence in the media is what’s causing it in real life. The Hunger Games is a great piece of literature, although I’m sure you think you’re too good for it.
For someone with a ‘Masters in Literature,’ you sure do have some issues with grammar.
I’m guessing you think Jonathan Swift ‘A Modest Proposal’ is sick by that logic.