To circumcise or not to circumcise, that is the question! Unfortunately, most of us don’t have any say on that matter when it comes to our own foreskin (or lack thereof). A colleague just sent me an interesting article on the decline of circumcisions in the United States, and it’s led me to wonder where you guys stand on this topic.
On one side of the fence, some folks have deemed circumcision as “culturally accepted genital mutilation”, arguing that the procedure is unnecessary, harmful and painful. However, the opposing side has called the practice “an important intervention to reduce the risk of heterosexually acquired H.I.V.” Read more about the debate here, and then feel free to weigh in with your opinion.
While we’re talking, let’s explore a different side of this issue. For those who are uncut, do you ever wish that you were circumcised? And for those who are cut, do you ever wish that you hadn’t been?
– Dewitt
Photo credit: Wank Off World
To check out some hot uncut cock, follow the JUMP:
YES, they should be banned. Teach boys to use condoms to prevent std’s. It is crazy to use this as a reason to mutilate.
no more circumcision for boys
i want my foreskin back!
uncut cocks look disgusting. and not every guy cleans his foreskin well. gross.
No, it’s the preference of the parents. Some people have too much fucking time on their hands always wanting to ban something. Show me one child that’s been permanently affected by circumcision. What next…banning gay marriage? oh wait.
Aesthetically, I just don’t find uncut cocks as attractive. And, like Bobby Ray, I find myself wondering just how clean they are. Silly, I know, but there you have it.
I am quite happy for either, really. Being from a country that DOES cut and living in one that DOESN’T, I almost find cut exotic? There are health benefits beyond STDs, though. Male bladder infections for one? I say leave it to the parents and leave it be.
Actually the start of circumcision was in religious practice and was for identification as well as hygiene. Circumcision is no more mutilation that tats and piercings, except with who got to decide.
As to uncut — can be hot but the guy has to be clean. I’ve had any number of guys that we start going, I pull back the foreskin to find plaque, for lack of a better word, and just like the sight or smell of brown from my bottom boi, the sight of residue under the foreskin is a major turnoff. I will and have sent guys away for not cleaning their lint trap.
On the flip side, I really enjoy seeing a cock getting hard and starting to poke out of the skin. Also uncut guys tend to be much more sensitive … and I’m very aggressive, often too aggressive for uncut guys which is a bummer.
Oh and one fantasy, I’ve never done it though … I want to cum inside a guys foreskin – just fill it up to overflowing. However, I’m usually too busy sending my seed inside another orifice or two … but I digress.
So is uncut a deal breaker? Not any more so than any other hygiene issue. And since I prefer men of color, those tend to be uncut more often than not.
I’m with Leo. We have WAY too many laws on our hands now. I’m sick of the government telling us what we can and cannot do. This IS a free country, isn’t it?
That said, I love a clean, un-cut cock!
YES!
One important stipulation – ban INFANT circumcision only.
This leaves the decision making to the rightful owner of said foreskin.
Many of us “cut” guys wish we’d been given the choice and it’s completely wrong to take that choice away.
I’m sorry,, but I don’t find anything attractive about a soft uncut cock. It doesn’t look like a dick, but more like just a tissuey member protruding below the abdomen. I love looking at a soft dick and seeing the shape of the mushroom head and the rest of the dick.
The only uncut cocks that i have found hot only belonged to the adult actors from Belami videos. Most often times, I focus on them hard, so I try not to dwell on the fact that they are uncut.
Circumcision goes back to the Bible days, and Jesus Christ was circumcised. I say let’s return to circumcision and end all the debate. We have enough laws telling us what we can and can’t do. When will the insanity stop! I could go on and on.. but I will end here.
I honestly prefer a un-cut cock.. Mostly because the first two guys I had sex with were huge 8inch and 10inch. They were both cut and really scary looking. Some times two toned and mutated.. Not for me.
WHY do people continue to think this is about what THEY prefer or find attractive?
It’s about having your own body under your own control.
I agree with ATOWNTOP. The only time a circumcision should be performed is with full consent! Whether done as a religious ceremony or completely for some crazy society’s idea of aesthetics, a man should be the one to say whether he wants to remain sensitive sexually or have a scarred, lifeless piece of wood for the rest of his life. 🙂
Ban in all together? N0!!!! what a silly question….
Some guys are circumsised for medical reasons when the foreskin is too tight it cause pain on passing urine, painful erections and can cause frequent urinary tract infections and penile thrush, but even so i guess it’s down to the individual to make an informed choice to have this done.
So i do oppose the practice of non-medical circumsision of children as they should be left to make the choice as adults.
Cut or uncut? There is one topic that will continue ad nauseam. While I really don’t favor any new laws or legislation, I wouldn’t disagree with ATOWNTOP about a ban on infant circumcision (except in situations involving religious or spiritual issues). But here’s something interesting from a book I read called “Private Parts: A Doctor’s Guide to the Male Anatomy” by Yosh Taguchi, MD. In it, Dr. Taguchi writes that there hasn’t been one documented case of penile cancer in a CIRCUMCISED male. Although penile cancer rates seem to be rather low (thank the good Lord for that!) and while I don’t want to scare the uncircumcised amongst us, this, I thought, was rather fascinating tidbit. As for one’s preference, no pun intended, but it’s all a matter of taste.
circumcision is GENITAL MUTILATION and there’s only one legitimate reason to do it. I only support circumcision if you are Jewish and it is a religious ritual. Any other parent who would even consider circumcising their son should loose their parental rights immediately.
I’m so happy my parent’s had me circumcised, I don’t find uncut attractive.
I love being cut
How about this for the anti-circumcicion crowd … be tolerant. Don’t get your panties in a wad and demand a government intrusion into our lives because you don’t like or agree with a practice. Be tolerant.
Circumcision started as a ritual with the Jewish people which, through Christ has continued on in Christian cultures. The US was a predominantly Christian nation (compared to today), thus you will find most circumcised men to be either Jewish or US citizen. Go outside the US and you find very few circumcised.
However, back to my main point. Be tolerant. Focus on something more important if you want to get the government snooping around and telling someone what they can and cannot do.
It’s ritualistic mutilation performed on non-consenting individuals. A baby sure as heck has no say in it. If a grown person wants it, fine. Religion has been used to justify this crap for millenia, and quite frankly I don’t feel the need to respect the belief that if you slice off part of a 7 day old boys body that kid is somehow closer to a fictional, made up god-thing.
As for medical purposes, sure, if it’s medically needed. No more.
i’m uncut and proud! wouldn’t change it for the world! 😀
i LOVE being circumcised… I am lazy and probably wouldn’t clean properly if I were uncut.
I’ve heard people say I would have more sensation if I were uncut… if that were the case I would never be able to walk… I’m 33 and am pretty much a walking erection as is… I don’t need any MORE sensation down there.
LOL
when I was still a virgin, I wanted to be circumcised SO BAD, but then I started fucking haha and now I LOVE IT…I’ve heard that the head is more sensitive when you’re uncut, so I feel bad for those cut guys that can’t experience sex to its full potential haha…ALSO all the gay guys I’ve been with love it too and can’t keep their mouths off it so…I’M NOT COMPLAINING ANYMORE…;]
It’s interesting that so many guys say they don’t find uncut cocks attractive. At one point on a date do you ask to verify circumcision? And if you don’t ask immediately, will you adjust your own qualms for someone you love, or is it a make or break?
Well the decision was not mine 2 make but I am glad my parents made the right decision I personally think the 4skin is NASTY & UNATRACTIVE !! However a hot guy with a rock hard bubble TIGHT ass cut/uncut does not matter 2 me I am a TOTAL TOP who loves a rock hard bubble tight ass !!
Carter Steele: 99.99% of Muslims perform circumcision when they were small too.
Is it necessary to ban? What next? Ban extractions in little kiddies for orthodontic treatment and WAIT until they become adults so they can make their own decision? (Sorry, I’m a dentist, can’t help). Geez..
I’m cut, and think it’s cleaner and more aesthetically appealing, but again – that’s me. I don’t think it warrants a legal ban, and honestly, it’s not truly mutilating the penis. If they were to mutilate it, they would do something far more horrific, like when they genitally mutilate a young girl – that’s far worse. If anything were to be banned, worldwide or in the US, regarding genital mutilation, it should be stop the outdated and horrific mutilations inflicted on young girls. At least with a cut cock you are still capable of real sex.
Love being cut!
lol uncut isnt that hot…
I was circumcised when I was 15, so I remember the pain and everything unlike a lot of guys that are circumcised as a baby. It’s pretty painful, and I find it hard to believe many guys will do it voluntarily if given the choice later in life.
Oh, and also – I was circumcised for medical reasons. My foreskin was too tight and wouldn’t pull back off my penis which caused me huge amounts of pain when I got erections – so you can just outright ban it!
I’m happy to be cut. Thanks, Mom & Dad! ha
I wonder what it would have been like had I not been cut at birth. I spent a lot of time healing the rage at my parents for tampering with how I was created – there is a reason why men are created with a foreskin and I believe parents do not have the right to play “God” just because they bonked and brought a child into the world. As for religious or traditional (thoughtless) practices, what about the adult’s right to leave that religion or change to one that suits them more.
Unless there are valid medical reasons I think it should be a decision left for the adult man to take about his own body. Educate don’t legislate…
Ban infant circumcision was the best comment. Other commenters were correct in that there are numerous cases in which medical circumcision relieves penile dysfunction. I will make a slight historical correction in that circumcision did not begin with the Jews. Jewish culture arose from the Canaanites around 1200 BC. Circumcision began millenia earlier with African tribes as a rite of passage into manhood. Mutilation rituals are common throughout Africa, and as usual, flinching was not allowed during this teenage ceremony. From central Africa the practice spread to Egypt and the horn, where it was discovered by the Jews. Whenever a religion is founded, practices are deliberately chosen to set it apart from what came before. Circumcision proved a useful visual differentiator from the rites of the Canaanites, and has been practiced ever since by the Jews. Btw, if you like smart guys, check my profile at LePenseur.
Cheers
wow I guess I’m the only one to comment that have been on both sides of this discussion. I actually got circumcised when I was 28 years old and I’m now 30. I choose to get this done because it was something that I always wanted. I was always aware of my hygiene so that was not the issue for me. But I have also been with guys or have friends that said the same thing as many of you have said “uncut is not attractive” and it always felt like I was dirty or disgusting to be with because of how society has made this comment such a norm. I’ve enjoyed sex uncut and cut and the one thing I can say is that it takes longer to come now that I’m cut which I do enjoy that lol. However, I do feel it should be left up to the young man when they are old enough to make a decision for themselves.
I never thought I would have to defend my parents in one of these message boards but NOYES my parents are awesome people even if they had me circumcised.
They made a choice and they thought it through and picked what they thought was best. They did it not for looks, or Christian Culture but because my dad was not circumcised and had to eventually have it done in his late teens for a medical reason and thought it was best to avoid that for me. To which I must say I am totally thankful.
And to everyone that wants to point out guys that are too sensitive or the lack there of for both cases maybe it is simply a person to person case. Being cut I have an excellent sex life and it feels perfect, the only time it is lacking is with a guy that is just not getting the job done.
I’m uncut and happy about it. I find cut dicks kind of scary looking, cause the head looks so huge, like a mushroom. Plus the glidding motion of the foreskin feels good 🙂
BTW DEWITT – Where is the equal representation of the CUT COCKS in this post. I agree these are hot cocks but how about sharing the love from the other side of the debate. Plenty of the pics in this site are of some very hot, yummy, and delicious cut men.
I’m another one of those who was circumcised as an adult, at the age of 29. As a child, I had suffered from infections under the foreskin. Keeping clean was a pain in the ass, so to speak. Judging by the sights and smells I have encountered with uncut sex partners, cleanliness is more of a problem than many are willing to admit. After being cut, I experienced no loss of sensitivity…and a great deal more acceptance from sex partners. I wish my parents had had me circumcised as a baby. The procedure wasn’t too painful, but the insurance company and I had to pay A LOT OF MONEY to get it done as an adult. I’ll also never forget my urologist informing me of having just cut some guy’s penis off because of penile cancer, uncut of course. With all respect for those who have a different opinion, I come down on the side of infant circumcision for both medical and aesthetic reasons.
I found it interesting to note that no one mentioned the fact that Muslims are also circumcised as a ritual of their religion [Abraham being a prophet of Islam too,]
In many African cultures cicumcision forms a part of a man’s right of passage to adulthood. He has no choice in the matter, as he will forever be considered a boy!! if he does not.
For the record, I was circumcised as an infant, as were/are most English speaking white South Africans. [Probably because at one time most doctors were Jewish!] White Afrikaans speaking males are usually uncut.
Probably because I am cut, I find the hidden head less artistically or aesthetically appealing. Like others have mentioned, as a confirmed cock-sucker, I too have had more than my fair share of “unsavoury” encounters with the unclean. Unfortunately NOT one of those times when one can “close your eyes and think of England!!”
I also noticed that there was only one guy who wanted his skin back! Although I have not tried this, I think it might work, even if only to find out just what one is missing; Try wrapping ones well-lotioned dick up and wear a cock-sock for a few days. Invite a friend to share your fun!!
The question itself is ridiculous.
So the millions of Jew’s and Muslims would just have to change a religious right that spans thousands of years?
You really couldn’t ban circumcision without banning it for everyone. A religious exemption really wouldn’t work. For obvious reasons.
Circumcision is much cleaner and it does reduce the risk of STD’s (not just HIV). Not to mention it just looks better. When I was a teenager I had an uncut BF. He had “PPP” which at the time I mistook for genital warts. I found out from my doctor that while it can occur in circumcised men it’s uncircumcised men that usually get “PPP”.
As for the whole ‘infant’ argument, maybe we should assign babies numbers until they turn 18 so they can choose their own name when they are old enough. Or we can just leave years of American culture and tradition alone.
PS
Circumcision is very American. If I ever see a white or black guy who is uncut I am generally turned off.
Circumcision should be a requirement more std’s can be passed via the uncut member
I’m circumcised but it was done when I was a year old because my foreskin was too tight and would swell
I don’t think it should be banned, but at the same time, I also think it probably should be performed when a boy is turning to an adult.
I had my circumcision in my late 20s, mainly because of personal preference and never regretted it. Sex is definitely better ever since because I last longer now.
Ok, like abortion (yes I’m pro-choice, no I don’t condone it so stfu and don’t slam my opinions and morals), this is not something the government should be getting into. It is up to the parents to decide. Be you Jewish or Goy, it is a common practice that no government should interject themselves into.
First off if circumcision was not around any everyone was uncut the whole… It looks ugly… blah blah… argument would not be around.
I was lucky enough to escape the knife. I am proud of being uncut… and I have become almost OCD about my body health because of it. I was taught at an early age how to clean it and it was distilled in me. To say that ALL uncut guys don’t take care of themselves is complete and utter BS. I know Cut guys that smell worse down there than uncut guys. Being unkept is universal its not just associated with being uncut.
It was done for medical reasons. Those medical reasons no longer valid since the invention of anti-bacterial soaps and other bacterial cleansing. If anything it should be a choice of the one having it done… Being because the foreskin is to tight and causes pain during erection or for some stupid idiot that doesn’t clean him self and keeps getting infections.
It should be banned… yeah its done barely out of the womb so they pain is associated with child birth. HOWEVER even psychologist say that Child Birth is an over dramatic situation for babies and adding more stress can’t be good.
Besides I would rather fuck with/suck on something in its natural state versus sucking on a big giant scar that wraps around the entire dick.
Uh…i completely disagree with Clifton – governments SHOULD step in and say, “no, you can’t take a sharp implement to that boy’s body and change it how YOU see fit.” Western governments certainly wouldn’t condone female circumcision, regardless of how invasive or not it is.
The only cases, from a healthcare perspective, that circumcision should be socially sanctioned is when the foreskin becomes phimotic and a) won’t retract, and b) is putting the health of the glans and rest of the penis at risk.
In that case, the question would be, “do we risk necrosis due to diminished blood supply, or do we risk necrosis due to tissue removal?”
The fact is, if anybody had taken to my penis with a sharp knife in order to change it to their liking, i’d feel my body was not my own. Okay, i may have grown up like it – but the reality is, it’s someone taking it upon themselves to change someone else’s body so it matches what they like, with no consideration of how the actual victim feels, or might feel, about it.
If an adult man wishes to get circumcised, that’s his choice; if a baby is circumcised, where’s the choice in that? i hope all the men here saying how they think circumcision should be accepted to stand in a line, pull their pants down, and let the rest of us select, on our own whim, who gets to keep their foreskin and who doesn’t.
Sound like a humane idea? Or is it just that you guys think babies aren’t real people yet? Have some freakin’ respect for the rights and sanctity of a person’s body as theirs to control and stop trying to assume control of it yourselves.
I, personally, am not the least bit attrtacted to uncut cock. I think they look abnormal.
And there’s the hygeine issue to think of.
I love the look of a cut penis and I prefer to suck a cut penis. Like many have said on here, there is nothing worse than pulling back a man’s foreskin to be confronted with white stuff and a cheesy smell (if he hasn’t cleaned it properly). It’s enough to turn you straight.
Having said all this, I was uncut til I was 30 years of age. I made the decision to go and get circumcised as I felt it looked better, and I got tired of gay partners there treating uncut as if it was a disease. After the surgery, I wasn’t prepared for was the incredible loss of sensation over a short period of time by the head of the penis being exposed constantly. The skin on the head basically hardens up, as does some of the inner skin below. They also removed my frenulum which used to give me lots of pleasure. I also miss the actual foreskin going backwards and forwards over the head during masturbation which meant I didn’t need to use lubricant.
So while I love the look of a cut penis, I can honestly say from having an uncut penis until I was 30, I really miss it. Cut guys miss out on many, many sensations. It simply is not natural for the head of the penis to be exposed 24 hours a day.
Cut guys who say their penises are sensitive have no idea what real sensitivity is. Only an uncut penis can provide full pleasure.
Circumcision is butchery and barbaric.
PSI and Noyes should move. I don’t want the government telling me what I can and cannot do. For Noyes to say that the parental rights should be yanked is mindless and rediculous! I love my parents and thank them every day that they made the decision they made! My first sexual experience was with a guy who had to have his removed when he was older. He cursed the day that his parents chose not to have him circumsized. Said it was the most painful experience he had ever had, both dealing with a foreskin that would not stretch and having it removed.
The government already is sufficating us! We don’t need anymore of it!
At Amen: They play God when they decide to abort. Do you support that?
And on a lighter note, UncutTiGGer (or something like that), how does one distill someone? Oh! Instill! LOL Just joking!
I think it should be the parent’s decision whether or not to circumsize their own child they brought in to the world. I guess they shouldn’t cut the umbilical cord nor name you and give you an identity because it wasn’t fair and you didn’t decide for it?
Im cut and glad that i am! Uncut is not attractive!
Here are the FACTS (…and I’m a health professional) … Circumcision: LOWER rates of urinary tract infection, penile cancer, penile inflammation, penile dermatoses, and sexually transmitted infections. HIV 50-60% LOWER in adult men who were offered circumcision at trial entry compared to those who were not offered circumcision. Possible Cons: Infection, poor cosmesis, meatal stenosis, surgical misadventures, and decreased sexual satisfaction (debateable). Know the FACTS, gentlemen.
yes infant circumcision should be banned. the only reason for it to be done is so the Dr can make a few more dollars. i know of a few guys that had it done when they were adults after a few months they were wishing they had never had it done. i see several comments where guys say they do not like the look of it but if it were the”:norm” they would be used to seeing it like that and not ever feel like that
eh. i’m a fan. aesthetically pleasing in my opinion..
so no on the ban. I like mine cut and trim.. the few uncuts I’ve seen are just a bit too much for me.. not something I wanna suck
circumcision should be MANDATORY/ there is nothing as grotesque as an uncut cock, except maybe a pussy,,,,,, if you’re mom didnt circumsize you, go to her now and slap the dumb bitch in the face
I personally love my cut dick! I also prefer cut ones on other guys. I’m with Will: it’s aesthetically pleasing.
It shouldn’t be mandatory either! Laws, laws, laws!! Sheesh! Leave the government out of our lives!
I’m 27. I had never seen an uncut cock till my last bf, At first I didnt know what to do with it. But now, its all I want. I’m talking to a Dr on my options to get mine back. It should not be allowed to be done to infants. MEN should have a choice as to wether they want cut or not. As long as it’s kept clean, these “facts” dont apply.
It should not be a matter of law, it should be personal choice or on medical grounds.
For a family that doesn’t talk about sexual things much, this is one thing I do have some knowledge of, and I consider myself fortunate for having known about it.
My older brother (8 years my senior) had a constricting foreskin at birth and doctors recommended circumcision. Because he had been, it was automatic for my parents to have me cut too.
As I became sexually aware I always wished I wasn’t cut until I learned that my paternal father has to have his urethra re-drilled every 6 weeks as he suffers from meatal stenosis. He had to be circumcised at age 45.
For those guys lucky enough not to have any plumbing issues, treasure it! And just be sure to keep it clean.
I chose to get cut later on when i was older. as a guy who used to be uncut I think circumcision should be decided once you’re an adult, an informed decision. i decided to do it when my foreskin got too tight and it became uncomfortable to have sex or even jerk off. after it i was very satisfied with the results and being able to shoot my load like before =) those who say pleasure is less are lying, unless it was done wrong, it’s the same for me and im enjoying my newly cut cock
I was circumsized at birth as the Dr told my parents it would be very painful for me later on. I think it should be done as needed. But I do agree, it does reduce the chances of infection. Also how many of you guys have experienced that Stale cheese smell?
It is a health hazard. Parents have every right to circumcise their children, just like they have every right to make other health decisions for them until they’re 18. Everyone thinks that being uncut makes you’re dick bigger, and that seems to be the only reason why people want to be uncut. But it is scientifically proven that dick size comes from the genes and not from having extra skin at birth.
Most people who are uncut do not know how to take care of it. Every uncut cock i’ve seen or been around has been nasty and disgusting.
Being uncut might be the sexier, and the more fetish driven choice, but circumcision is clearly the healthier and cleaner decision.
While there are arguements going both ways on the whole circumcise/not circumcised issue, what remains is that it should be up to the man to do what he wants with his body when he can make an informed decision. Earlier should be out of necessity because of health issues only. As for what is attractive and good looking? Who is to decide what is attractive on YOUR body? It is a personal choice that noone should have the right to criticize others for the way they want all of their body to look.
i was circumcized when i was 4 the reason? the foreskin prevented urine flow it hurt way too much and infections and other complications were going to end up happening so it wasnt for looks it was purely medical so ya it sucks that i dont have as much pleasure if i didnt get it cut but i was just unlucky besides i have enough fun with my above avearge thick dick anyways. hehehe!
Americans are uninformed, as has been made clear in the posts above. As an uncut American, I can say that I love having an unmutilated cock. I have been with many guys that loved playing with my foreskin, and for a lot of those, I was their first uncut. I have never had any kind of infection, as I was taught from an early age how to keep my cock clean. In fact, the uncut guys that I’ve been with have been a lot cleaner than most of the cut guys. It’s idiotic to make such a big generalization about cleanliness, because a dirty person is a dirty person. As far as HIV statistics… I doubt anyone on this site is heterosexual, and these statistics are about heterosexual transmission. The most effective HIV prevention is abstinence… Which I don’t think is gonna happen within the gay community. So wrap your dick, uncut or not. If you don’t like the way it looks, don’t sleep with an uncut guy. But remember, that will eliminate a majority of the South American, European, Asian, and Australian population off of the list of people you can get off with. And make sure you ACTUALLY play with an uncut cock before you form any opinions about them. 😉
I’ve enjoyed the sausage both in and outside of its casing. I love the aesthetics of both, and have no qualms about being with a cut or uncut man. As for the hygiene arguments, it should be a factor regardless if he was cut or uncut.
What do you mean it will wipe most Australians off you’re list. I think you’re very misinformed,
I’ve been with uncut guys who haven’t been able to pull there skin, and thus have the trouble of getting in there and cleaning it. Guess it depends on the person, how tight the foreskin. But isn’t prevention better then correction?
quite a silly practice with poorly backed data proof.
can’t imagine myself without my foreskin.
Well it certainly is easier to circumsize at birth, but it really takes away the guys choice. Adult circumsizion is really painful and harder to heel, but at least it would be the guys choice. Personally, I do not like uncut dick, they are slimy and smelly and they usually have small heads. I like a nice fat mushroom head and you just dont get that when the penis grows surrounded by foreskin.
hy_boi, Nlavoix is right. I’m Australian and as a country we have had a move away from circumcision since the late 70’s.
People who say uncut cocks are disgusting are fools, as there are just as many cut guys I’ve been with who have ugly penises. Should I now say all cut cocks are hideous?
If there are life threatening or ‘right to thrive’ issues with a foreskin, only then should it be cut as a child. Otherwise the right to body modification needs to be made by the individual, not by the parents.
As for cleanliness and health risks that is just a farce. I’ve been with plenty of uncut guys with no problems, why? Because as a group we aren’t just going to ignore our cocks! If its dirty, we clean it. That prevents infections. As for HIV, its called a freaking condom!
I’m uncut, and only because I was born prematurely(I have 2 brothers that are both cut). Apparently I was too small to perform the procedure. The only thing I didn’t like about being uncut was the high school lockers rooms because I was self conscious. But once I actually started having sex I realised that it was a good thing. Every encounter I’ve had has had a good reaction, and I enjoy other guys with uncut dicks as well.
it’s a small amount of skin that exists or doesn’t, it really doesn’t make much of a difference.
I hate uncut dick.
i’m cut and proud to be.
i have a slight preference for cut partners, but generally cut/uncut has no effect on my choice of partner… (unless they have what i’d consider an unattractive penis, cut or uncut… admittedly i’ve found more unattractive uncut dicks, but there are still less than appealing cut ones out there…
i’m uncut (and Australian too, btw) – i was taught to make sure i kept myself clean from a very young age -it really takes 5 seconds to pull back the skin, soap up quickly, and wash off. its no big deal. and as long as you pull it back when you pee – which most guys do, simply because its easier to aim – its not gonna be “slimy” or gross. and as someone else said – a dirty person with an sti is a dirty person with an sti – foreskin or not, theyre still not gonna have washed their dick or worn a condom.
i dont think its fair to make any blanket statement about whether it should or shouldn’t be banned but i do think that one should be able to make their own decision about it – so perhaps not allowed at birth. and i do get a considerable bit of sensation from the foreskin, so it seems like maybe keeping it would be for the best!
I’ve seen too many uncircumcised dicks that have a real nasty smell and look when you pull the foreskin back. Hardly ever bother with a guy who isn’t cut because I immediately think “unclean”… and run away..
Uncut = men from the lower classes.
Is it just me or is it ironic that people think the natural option is the worst thats like preferring men to have one testicle instead of two. The whole reduces infections argument is quite flimsy because most guys don’t get lots of those infections it apparently reduces anyway because the vast majority of guys clean themselves properly to prevent them. The solution to prevent this is good hygiene not accepted genital mutilation. I don’t see how anyone can argue that parents should have the right to make this decision, it’s the child’s foreskin, if he doesn’t want it he should have the option to remove it as it is a permanent procedure.
I feel it should be an option, like botox or breast enhancements. I was circumcised at an early age, and it’s always left me wondering what would it be like to have more of a foreskin. Since the procedure is one way, I feel the person should make the choice themselves, not their parents.
Yeah Im cut, I dont believe I lose out on any sexual stimulation. I have great sex, can last for ages when i top a guy.
Cut cock looks good – if you are hanging out with a guy naked, you want to see his cock, not foreskin covering the whole head of his cock. Same for when he is hard and the foreskin doesnt go back – not good. Personally if the foreskin doesnt go back when hard, im not really keen to suck it. I want to suck whats underneath.
Yes being circumcises is a choice, but there is no harm in having it done, and I do believe that it is healthier, so get it done or not, but never ever ban it.
I can say I agree with both sides of this argument, however this is just as wild a topic as who is hotter white guys, black guys, Asian ect…
Mutilation is a rough term, we are not scaring them and destroying them. It is a practice that if done by a doctor will lead to a normal sex life , just as men who are cut that keep things clean have a perfectly healthy sex life.
So what you want in bed is all a matter of preference. Some of the guys on here sounds as idiotic as if they made a statement to the effect of all white guys are hideous, or all black guys are stupid thugs – you know what I mean. But then again, no wonder the rest of the world thinks of us as second class when we treat each other like we are.
I find uncut dicks a turn-off. I admit it’s entirely my personal preference, but foreskins gross me out.
I can’t believe how many responses sound completely ignorant and hurtful. I am cut and 28, more than half the guys I have fooled around with my age were uncut and everything was perfectly fine, they were not “smelly”, “gross”, or “slimy.” If a guy is dirty and doesn’t shower, his junk is going to stink no matter what. Half of you guys sound like little kids saying other kids have cooties, grow the fuck up!
Uncut here and never had an issue with health or cleanliness.Looks uncut when erect as it automatically retracts when hard. Never had an issue with “cheese” or odor since started masturbating and allowing foreskin to retract and be washed completely when showering. Like any other sterotype opinion,(“uncut = unclean”) it’s usually held by uniformed people who never experienced one but just heard it.
I’m cut from birth. I think the argument for circumcision based on health benefits is not sufficient to justify it being performed at birth (I am also a health professional). I can see why it is done at birth though, as I can’t imagine many grown men electively going for circumcision. If I were uncut I don’t think I would ever choose to be circumcised unless I had a good reason. Can anyone who has decided to get circumcised for non-health reasons comment on their motivations please?
I’m uncut and love it. I wouldn’t want it any other way. It’s amazing how much baggage cut guys can have around an uncut cock…as is evidenced by some of the above comments like “there is nothing as grotesque as an uncut cock”. Wow…really? It’s just skin but it’s still a cock. Circumcision should be a decision that adults make for themselves and not something a doctor decides at birth.
If we were’nt supposed to have it we wouldn’t be born with it! learn how to keep your dick clean and shut the fuck up!
I don’t quite get all the yelling and name calling. You don’t have to like cut or uncut, but can we please stop referring to uncut as being “gross” and cut as being “mutilated?” Outside of Gay-topia, there are real issues that people argue over. Sigh, when did gay men become 14 year old girls?
I miss my foreskin! 🙁
At first I thought uncut was nasty looking. Now I love it! Cut or uncut, I just love dicks! I do have more fun witht he skin tho! MMMMM! Nothing gently sucking on the skin and make the man go crazy!
Firstly thanks brian for his first response which is very concise and has saved me posting it myself (although i did double check everything). As for genital mutilation thats a very strong term, but hey while we’re at it isn’t genital piercings a form of mutilation are you guys going to try and tell me that you dont find those hot? or any other piercing? or tattoos? lets face it by your definition of ‘mutilation’ all of these forms of self expression are mutilation so either you’re calling it a bit too big (hey its the gay scene what can we really expect from you) or you’re completely naturalistic in which case more power to you. Furthermore genital mutilation generally refers to female circumcision so maybe we could be a bit more careful with out language.
There are indeed health reasons for doing it and i find it hard to believe any doctors anywhere are performing this procedure without consent (im a medical practitioner in australia so maybe america is different). When i was younger i worked as a carer for adults with disabilities and i have to agree with the overall statement that it is easier to maintain a circumcised penis and for that kind of situation i was greatful to the parents that had the foresight to get their children cut. However the point is that it is easier to maintain, not impossible to have a clean uncut penis. Banning circumcision is one of the stupidest ideas i’ve heard, lets not bother getting into the ethical dilemma of striping away people’s autonomy but based on the health aspects alone its a bad idea, hell why not ban vaccination?
Generally i have a tendency to sleep with guys that are cut, not because i find them cleaner (the guys i go home with have all their teeth and matching shoes – if you pick up your expectations guys maybe the uncut guys you do go home with will be cleaner… just saying) but because the head of their penis is less innervated, this means they last longer in the bedroom.
Trying to argue whether something looks good or bad is simply ridiculous why not argue about the taste of apples and oranges?
I still disagree that being cut makes you cleaner its about your own personal cleanliness (cut guys how about you go a few days without showering and wear the same underwear then tell me your still clean… dirty is dirty) its just harder to maintain, so in some circumstances yes circumcision is a good idea but really it is a decision for adults to make.
Personally i am uncut, i have never and will never get cut because i like my penis the way it is and the sensation i have in my foreskin, but thats my choice as an adult i generally shower twice a day because of work and gym so that keeps me plenty clean. And on a side note Eric i’m a doctor pretty sure im not lower class
Just on a final note, i have seen two men that are missing their genitals because of infection after circumcision, like all medical procedures it comes with risk. its just a bit of food for thought.
I’m cut, and should I ever have kids, they will be, as well. It’s a matter of personal preference – and I’ve several friends who were uncut, until they were in their 20s, and paid for their own circumcisions.
germany does not mkae it manditory, and they have no spikes in any of those rates so nicely stated in the 1st opinion. 2nd it was the doctors who pushed this, so mr. medical profession get thoe facts correct, i would say more but then i would be banned or accused of being a racist in regards to the practice in the US.
okay im uncut, and ever since i was 5 years old, i clean it every day, pull it back, add some soap, swirl it around and rinse it all out, as long as the child is taught how to take care of it the same way to brush their teeth or comb their hair it isnt that big of a deal, until i was it looked like i had parmesan cheese in mine!!! Since then i’ve actually been told mine is the cleanest guys have ever seen and it smells nice because of the body wash getting left behind.
I’m cut and I love it. I don’t care if it’s mutilation. It’s cleaner. Most of the foreskins I’ve come across in my life have been smelly and gross. MOST uncut men don’t clean as much as they should, so when I see a cut cock, I breathe a sigh of relief, knowing I’m not in for the possibility of smegma.
I’m cut, and I prefer me who are also cut. I know from other men in my family who aren’t cut that there are some pretty major health problems that can pop up later on in life if you’re uncut. My Grandfather suffered from urinary tract infections all the time. It was partially cleaning, but he was almost in his 90s. If he had been cut then the cleaning would have been easier for him and he would have never had that problem. I personally prefer the look of a cut penis. Uncut ones look like little Elephant trunks, and almost look as unappealing as a Vagina. I will say though that it should not be banned. It really should be a choice. Even if the parent chooses to have it done, they are doing it most likely for health reasons and have the interest of their child at heart. If you go around banning things like this, then what are we saying? Especially as a gay community. You want to ban this, but want to be allowed to get married? So you are ok with taking away the rights of another, but want a right to be given to you? I would never feel right to tell someone I don’t think they should be allowed to do something that has been free and done naturally for centuries, and then turn around and say, that I want them to change something so I can be married to my boyfriend. It’s two totally different sides to the same coin. It’s about freedom people. You can prefer cut or uncut, but don’t say it should be banned. Especially when it’s something that doesn’t really hurt anyone. It’s simple, you live fine through it and you will get laid if your cut or uncut.
I must say its a tough one. I was actually circumsized when I was around 11 years old. My moms mom didn’t want them to make the decision for me b.c its my body. So when I was 11 they pretty much scared me into it by saying how horrible and hard it would be to not have it done. So I said yeah barely knowing what I was even getting into. I regret it to this day. I feel like I lost a lot of stimulation tho I still have some. And honestly I like uncut cocks and wish mine was still in tact.
NO!
No,its simply a personal choice, sometimes done for either religous or hygein.It does not bother me one way or another.-Roy
I’m with the people who are calling for a modicum of decorum! Seriously, “Genital mutilation” and “uncut = unclean”? Blanket statements are incredibly damaging and will never be true. As the gay community, we should know this better than most!
No, I don’t think circumcision should be banned. I think that circumcision at birth should be avoided, but an honest and frank discussion with the child at an age where they can make a reasonable choice would be appropriate.
Some people have asked that men who chose adult circumcision speak up. That would be me. Three reasons I decided to go for it – aesthetics, cleanliness, sexual pleasure.
Aesthetics – I’ve always preferred the look of cut cock, not heaps more than uncut, but I do prefer it. (A quick note – my sex life contains more uncut cock than cut, cock is cock, the man it’s attached to is the sexy bit)
Cleanliness – I made an effort to keep it clean, but I produced more smegma than most, apparently. (to keep things down there clean and smelling nice, I’d have to wash it about every 12 hours or so – It wasn’t an infection according to my doctor, I was just unfortunate.)
Sexual Pleasure – Now, I’m a vers/bottom, about 20/80 when I was uncut. When topping, I’d pull the skin back, push in, and on the first out-stroke, my foreskin would roll over the head, but the in wouldn’t retract it again. It was basically masturbating without using my hands. (or at least, not using them on myself)
I spent 2 years getting information about it and researching on the net, seeing if there were less invasive options that would give me some results. No dice, I went to my GP who questioned me, warned me about the pain, and then referred me to a urologist (I noted with amusement that she stated I was “adamant” on the referral).
I saw the urologist, explained to him pretty much what I’ve told you now. He then got me to the bench where he examined my cock. He declared that I had a very mild phimosis, and about 4 months later, I went under the knife.
The next 4-6 weeks were a bitch! Flesh that was not used to being exposed was exposed and therefore was sore etc. by the end of week 6, things had settled down, and I was back to misusing my weapon of mass creation, if still someone gently.
The first time I topped after the circumcision I was amazed! I actually understood why guys liked it so much! I never realised quite how much shielding that foreskin was giving me from the pleasure of fucking someone.
Now it’s more like 40/60 top/bottom, I still love to take, but I’m much more inclined to give it too. My cleanliness issues are no more, and I like the look of my equipment more.
On one hand, I value that I had a choice in all of this, and that I know that I’ve made the right choice in regard to my body. On the other, The part of me that held back for two years until I was really sure that was what I wanted really felt that it would have been a lot easier if my parents had decided for me, or if It’d been done pre-puberty.
No. It shouldn’t be banned.
In Australia at least, it seems to be frowned upon for a man to ask to be circumcised, certainly my GP tried to warn me off the procedure without exactly saying that I shouldn’t do it. And it’s somewhat embarrassing, even with a GP you’re comfortable with, to discuss not-exactly-medical dick issues. The Australian system makes you do it twice – I can’t just book into a urologist here without a referral from a GP.
In my case, I didn’t know what I was missing until I got cut, and I wonder how many other people are in similar boats, but can’t quite get the courage to get their dick looked at multiple times by multiple people, or who aren’t willing to say “I prefer the look enough that a little pain isn’t gonna scare me away” etc.
What I can and will say is that if you think you’d like to get cut, talk to your GP about it. The pain is minimal – I took Ibuprofen (an anti-inflammatory, Australian best-known brand is Neurofen) for a week and Paracetemol (Tylenol, I think the Americans call it) for another two. Take into account the risks, there are risks for all surgical procedures, but definitely talk to your GP about it.
Finally, there’s nothing wrong with being uncut either! If they’re clean, cocks are cocks. I just don’t get the mentality where you go for only one or the other!
Leave the foreskin alone! What are all you guys taking about “every foreskin I’ve ever seen was smelly!”? I live in NYC and there are plenty of uncut guys here, and never have I encountered a dirty uncut cock. Does that make me lucky? No. It just means guys pull back their foreskins and wash. I’m cut and will have a kid or two in the future (either via adoption or surrogate mom) and will not allow my sons (if I have boys) to be cut at birth. Most of the “problems” with the foreskin are caused by improper care (forced retraction, harsh soaps etc) and not because the foreskin is flawed. Canada, Europe, South America, Australia, and most of Asia do not circumcise and their dicks aren’t falling off. My partner is a doctor and picks apart all these “less HIV and STDs if you circ” studies without breaking a sweat. It’s all a bunch of B.S. The choice should NEVER have been taken from me when I was a baby.
Circumcision is surgery and carries risks just as any surgery does. As a surgical procedure it should not be done without real medical necessity and there are some such as an inability to retract the foreskin enough during an erection to prevent pain.
One month before my son was born, two infants at the same hospital where he was scheduled to be born had circumcisions when the electric scalpel malfunctioned damaging their penises severely and permanently. It is irreversible. I had a boyfriend whose circumcision was not well done and left very noticeable scars.
In addition, when I still worked in healthcare I witnessed two circumcisions performed without even local anesthesia. The pediatrician who did them claimed that the infants did not experience pain. Their cries were a type of cry that I only saw in my kids when they were in a great deal of discomfort. It resembles a high pitched scream.
I was circumcised at 17. It was foolish and definitely led to a little reduction in sensation. Wearing underwear was extremely uncomfortable until my normal sensitivity declined to adapt the exposure. For two or three weeks, I would awaken during the night because of an erection during sleep. The stitches didn’t stretch while everything else tried to expand fully. Before circumcision, blowjobs although rare were exquisite. After circumcision, I found them a little boring because it almost never led to orgasm. I now, consider oral sex to be nothing more than foreplay.
My son was circumcised at 14 but only because he couldn’t retract his foreskin at all.
Doing it for religious purposes borders on child abuse and endangerment. Just as are rightly horrified at the thought of female circumcision, we should be equally horrified at the practice of circumcising infant or very young boys without medical reason. All the talk of hygiene and reduced STD infections is nothing but a red herring. Cleaning under the foreskin is even less difficult than cleaning behind your ears. If STDs are a concern, use a condom for nearly 100% protection vs. 40% to 60%. It amazes me the human species avoided extinction with all the foreskins that use to exist in all males.
I am cut, and I wish a lot of the time tha I wasn’t
Im cut and glad. losers your risk of STDs by 60% in a study done in africa. also its more hygienic especially since alot of guys slobs and lazy cant imagine going down on them and having some bacterial growth going on down there. also it look disgusting in my opinion. Looks like a animals dick or a worm lol
I am uncircumcise and glad.Men who are circumcise really are missing such a great sensation and foreplay can be so much fun. I do like men circumcise but it so much to play with the foreskin. Hygiene is a important thing and being uncircumcise makes you realize to be clean. Lastly, it is each ones decision and to accept a man either way is the most important thing. Going down on someone is fun but a clean man is great.
I think you can view circumcision in a few ways.
My personal view stems from, ‘if its not broken dont fix it”
today’s society is very advanced… medically wise, we are doing things we never dreamed. Prophylaxis and avoiding diseases are certainly the modern way of thinking.
consider however at birth if we went straight into the operating theater and had our appendix removed, our tonsils removed or any moles removed. ALL of these can potentially get infected, some are even life threatening when they are. What im saying is that with foreskins, i think as long as they are maintained (cleaned and looked after, including having safe sex) then really, you WILL have a normal functioning penis.
I am appalled at the comment made referring the uncut men as losers and mentioning that men are lazy any way… this is very immature and an irresponsible and generic comment that is stereotyped. If you didn’t brush your teeth because you were lazy, then you will get gingivitis… get my drift? there is laziness and then there is hygiene.
In addition that that, i think we need to be cautious when believeing the literature when statistics are thrown around… what type of study was it? what was the methods? was it randomised? what popuytlation was used? Unless it is level I evidence, i would not put my faith into it. statistics are only helpful when applied exactly to the population they represent. also, even if you were cut and had poor hygeine, your risk of getting STI’s is increased. It really comes down to taking care of yourself and making good lifestyle choices.
Lastly, in regards to getting circumcised for religious matters, well… my views are against this. but this is a personal view based on what I’ve written above. in all sense, knowing the ramifications of having a cut penis should perhaps make people more aware of what they may predispose their children to, an informed decision should be made with the appropriate people (medically trained). Its a permanent thing and as with all things permanent, you want to be sure you have considered all options.
Thanks men, and i guess again, to reiterate, the bottom line is we should all clean down there, go for regular checks and practice safer sex. This way you would have done all you can to avoid an STI.
I never really thought too much about circumcision until about a year or so ago. I am circumcised, and had never really entertained the thought of what it would be like not to be, or if i agreed with it or not. Then i discovered that the foreskin could be “restored”, through non-surgical means, and look almost identical to an uncut dick, minus the frenar bands and other nervous and muscle tissue that is part of the natural foreskin. After research to find out more about it, i started becoming more and more frustrated and disgusted that i had NO choice in the matter. I even wrote a paper on why it is NOT necessary as a preventative practice, or even beneficial to an individual.
Sure, if a young man suffers from phimosis, the abnormal tightening of the foreskin that interferes with an erection, then perhaps the surgery might be desired; but there are non-surgical, natural remedies for this as well, in the form of gradual and gentle stretching of the foreskin over time to allow a full erection.
Circumcision dates back thousands of years, and was the result of superstition and ignorance. We as a highly civilized and progressive culture have no right or reason to force the removal of the most important and sensuous parts of the male anatomy in regards to sexual pleasure; such an act i consider a violation of human right. A man should have the power to decide such a surgery, such a life-changing option, for himself when he is capable of understanding the choice he is faced with, if desired, and exercise his right as a functional and intelligent human being to make such a decision.
Being circumcised i feel that i am not whole, nor equal to an uncircumcised male in regards to function or form. An uncut dick posesses a great deal more feeling and stimulation, due to the softened state of the head, and vastly greater amounts of nerve endings at the outer part of the penis. Every day i am reminded over and over that i lack a fundamental part of my anatomy, and it pisses me off. Not only that, but i think an uncut cock is SOOO much more attractive and hot; the idea of seeing myself with an uncut dick, playing with my foreskin, exploring and loving another uncut cock, is enough to get me off!
Let people choose for themselves.
phimosis acan also be remedied with a partial circumcision. my friend had this done and it works very well, allowing the foreskin with all its nerve endings to remain, but opened with a v-cut.
i was born in the states in an era when most boys were routinely circumcised. it’s a barbaric, money-making scam in which i had no say.
For those of you who say you don’t like how it looks, you don’t have anything to compare it to reality, and you also conveniently forget that that’s precisely how a cock is supposed to look. As for hygiene, any man who doesn’t clean his most precious jewels should have been born without. NO ONE WANTS FILTHY! And it ISN’T that hard to do to clean yourself, I do it everyday. Really…what’s an extra 5 seconds??? Those of us who have it like the sensation and don’t want to change it. In fact some get piercings just to amplify the nerve stimulation. However, these are decisions we make as adults. And this modification should be no different. I guarantee that if we banned newborn circumcision AND LEFT THE DECISION TO THE PERSON ATTACHED TO THAT SKIN, we would see the practice die. And see, since none of us remember that moment, we forget that they while we were fresh and new, a sadistic pervert in a while lab coat took us to a sound-proof room (I wonder why?!?), strapped us down to a child restraint seat bolted to a heavy table, and with our arms, legs, and head immobilized, molested us into comfort and our first unnecessary erection, and while in our state of euphoria, and WITHOUT ANY anesthesia, neither general or topical, ripped the skin off our still undeveloped heads, and cut it off. And as if that were not enough, charged our parents $100 to do the procedure, sold it to a pharmaceutical company who would grow 10,000 square feet of dermaplast from it, which they sell back to the doctor who sells it back to you for way too much per square inch to use as a fake skin. And considering they already use pig skin for that, well, this procedure could otherwise be labeled as “PAYING TO HAVE SOMEONE RAPE YOU”. We should always make decisions for ourselves and NEVER let anyone else take that away from us. For those of you who were not left alone to make the decision yourselves, you can change that. That skin stretches just like any other. Look up a man named Wild Thunder!!!! He invented a solution and it works – he is the living proof.
Love,
Rev.Tim
me personaly i like having my cock cut, it makes it easier to clean
I’m from the UK I’m uncut and I love being uncut!! BUT I wouldn’t want the government stepping in on what is actually quite a trivial issue..
If circumcision is required for medical reasons, then it should ABSOLUTELY be performed. But it should be left until actual medical reasons are established. The majority of infections etc. can be prevented through good personal hygiene, surely soap and water is preferable to a scalpel. I don’t like the idea of generation of gay guys saying things like “It’s OK, I don’t need a condom I cut”. The 1st guy that says that to me won’t be fucking me, but he can be sure I’ll kick the crap out of him before I leave. It’s my ass on the line, so I’ll over-react if I want to..All those guys going on about “more aesthetically pleasing” need to get a grip, the majority of modern gay men are shallow morons. I’m 27 I play rugby and keep myself in shape. I also groom myself to the level of an Abercrombie model. I’m just as guilty of being shallow as any of the rest of you. I expect guys I hook up with to take as much care of themselves, as I take of myself. But when it comes to his cock, I don’t much care how it looks. As long as it’s 7 inches plus, clean, fully functional and he knows what he’s doing with it..As for the Parents/Doctors making the decision to circumsize at birth, I don’t think it can be justified in way. Let’s face it!! We’re men and as men we place far too much importance on our cocks, to allow other people to make decisions regarding it. In my mind it’s a lot like those parents, who buy their daughter a nose-job for her sweet 16. Or a woman allowing her boyfriend to decide if she gets a breast enlargement or not.. @ SPORTING – I’ve experienced virtually no guys, that smell of stale cheese and I’m surrounded by uncut cock, even the few American’s that I’ve been with were uncut. Not that I have a preference either way! Hygiene should be taken seriously whether your cut or uncut!!
I’m circumcised and I HATE it !
I think it looks ugly , the scar , the dry glans , the tight shaft skin , the ” turkey neck ” between the scrotum and the base of the penis …
I also think a circumcised flaccid penis looks obscene , as the glans is a sexual organ that should only be seen when having sex , NOT in the locker room !
Also , an intact penis is a COMPLETE penis , and a cut penis is INCOMPLETE , as something has been CUT away from it !
I’m gay and I prefer the natural complete penis , not the surgically modified ones , where something is obviously lacking .
My favourite foreskins are the extra long ones , that cover the glans even when hard , I love to suck on them and taste the precum collecting inside of it with my tongue .
I also prefer a dick that smells like REAL MAN dick , and not some sanitized soap-smelling dry plastic dildo !
When I have a new regular lover , I usually ask him to NOT wash his dick before seeing me , as I love to smell and EAT the cheese . If he refuses to NOT wash it , it’s a DEALBREACKER !
So , all of you who are pro infant circumcision , F*** you all , as I consider you co responsible for MY mangled dick !
As for my parents , who made me circumcise in 1965 , I don’t think they are bad , but they were IGNORANT and MISINFORMED by some money greedy so called “doctor” .
I don’t think the government needs to do anything about circumcision. Our parents chose what is right for us as children because that is their job. I do not believe it’s mutilation at all. I was uncut until the age of 24 and 4 years later I am loving it! The sensation is there, I dunno what people are talking about loss of sensitivity? I personally think I am more sensitive now than when I was uncut, and my orgasms are very intense now. I even last longer than I used to. My sex partners love it as well. I would not reject a guy for being uncut at all, but I do prefer circumcised men because it usually is a guarantee that I will have great sex. I have lived in Europe, Canada, Australia, Mexico and the USA and I have to say sex with circumcised men has usually been better than with uncircumcised men. Lets not lie and try to say that Western countries don’t need to have circumcision for the hygienic reasons because of soap and water…I’ve met many clean-cut looking guys who had the worst hygiene and the penis was the worse part for I found cheese looking stuff and the smell was horrendous. Banning it would be very stupid.
PS: Why not show pictures of beautiful circumcised men? Because there are millions like this1
Because you’ve experienced difficulties cleaning it when you were intact…Oh no, it was most likely done at birth or not very far from it, so you don’t know what the fuck you are talking about.
What a poor argument, “easier to clean”…
What others organs will you amputate because you’re too lazy to take a shower?
WHy would you support it if the parent is jewish? The son could grow up to be an atheist and resent his mutilation, this is really not a valid reason.
There are even jews that resent being cut, as the current ritual extends WAY further than what was advocated in the bible : the second procedure ” periah” is the most destructive one as it was done to keep jews from “regrowing” their foreskin when they lived among the greeks. They cut way more than what was first intended ( which is wrong too, but now it’s worse)
It should be up to the person when she is 18 or older what body modifications and amputations( because it’s what it is…) they want to perform.