In a move that’s sure to upset some folks—especially in a week where Rod Daily‘s HIV test came back positive and Dean Monroe quit the gay porn industry due to “bareback” controversy—Lucas Entertainment‘s online communications manager Jett Black announced that the studio would be releasing its first hardcore scene without a condom.
The clip features real-life partners Seth Treston and Billy Santoro doing exactly what they’d do behind closed doors, leading to an internal cum shot that leads to some felching (the practice of eating cum from your partner’s asshole, for those of you who aren’t familiar with the term).
“To shoot real-life couple Bill Santoro and Seth Treston was to witness true intimacy,” director Adam Killian stated in the press release. “Interviews with them, which we included in the scene, allowed us into their hearts and minds as they described how they met and fell for each other. This is much more than just a sex scene—it is the most authentic love scene I’ve ever shot.”
Given their career, Billy and Seth obviously do not share a monogamous relationship, and this is not Billy’s first time filming a bareback scene. Hearing that might prompt you to say “So what?” or send you into an angry rage… But let’s not make this about Billy and Seth themselves! In your opinion, should individuals in committed relationships use condoms with one another? If they’re truly monogamous, does your answer change or remain the same?
– Dewitt
Photo credit: Lucas Entertainment
Watch Billy and Seth make love in a free preview clip below:
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE…
–
–
Should anyone outside of a given couple’s relationship feel entitled to expression an opinion about the interpersonal mechanics of that couple’s sex life at all?
No. No they really shouldn’t.
Your right what a couple does with each other is their own business.
9 times out of 10 they have more to worry about from outsiders they allow into their bedroom.
My husband and I have not used condoms with each other for the past 8.5 years not since our first test we took that proved we were negative of all STD’s and safe to do it.
This does not come very long after Michael Lucas’ endorsement of Truvada to “prevent HIV” XD
For $12 000 a year with side effects and low efficiency (44% less chances of getting contamined – yeah!), why not?
Realistically though you’d still have to wear a condom if you have 2 brain cells.
Not saying anything about this particular scene, I don’t think much of it.
After reading about that HIV positive guy that knowingly had unprotected sex with near 300 people over the last 10 years I’d say yes. He even lied to his live in partner and infected him over the course of their relationship. His defense was he “feared rejection”.
There are plenty of stories like this, I guess it really depends on the level of trust you have in your partner and the amount of risk you are willing to take.
Pete Burns is a famous case…His boyfriend slept around bareback with the whole town without telling him, while he thought they were monogamous so they didn’t use protection…Oops
Be nice if MHD posted about these kinds of stories to illustrate the potential consequences of unprotected sex and not disclosing status. The topic is controversial enough.
I have no place to tell consenting, well informed adults what to do with each other. In my relationships, we didn’t use barriers. Regular testing and honesty is key.
Another topic for discussion, should 2 (or more) virgins, neither of whom have any infections at all, have non-barrier sex?
I refuse to call it protection or safe. Calling a natural act unsafe stigmatizes the act.
For the first few months, yes. Once it has been established that bot partners are negative and COMPLETELY monogamous, then it’s up for discussion.
both, not bot
I think they should but like so many have already indicated what 2 people do concerning there own relationship is there business , Michael Lucas on the other hand is a LYING HYPOCRITE ! He out of all people has the AUDACITY to release a BB scene after all the chess banging that has done over the years about practicing safe sex with his holier than thou approach and now only to find out ( like I already said ) he is a LYING HYPOCRITE !!!
BTW Mr.Lucas I CANCELLED MY MEMBERSHIP !!!
don’t dis on robot sex. robots should be allowed to express love, too.
Of course, no one can truly and accurately judge anothers’ relationship and practices. Speaking for idea and ideals of relationships, we should probably stick to condoms till we DTR and agree to monogamy and have both been tested. Don’t assume committed and monogamous equates an eschewing of safer sex practices on either side.
We can only hope that a couple is well educated (aware of dormancy of HIV), honest with each other about the past and well tested over a period of time. Sounds pretty mechanical, but that is the world we live in. I survived the 80’s, am now 65 and have no idea why. But every single guy needs to address this matter for HIMSELF. Even in a partnerships. Please be wise, guys. Then enjoy the decision you have owned for yourself and yourselves.
Interesting to see the holier-than-thou MIchel Lucas exposed as a total hypocrite, after spending years making nasty remarks about other studios and passing judgment on other performers. Maybe his mega-rich “boyfriend”/sugardaddy got tired of bankrolling Mikey’s porn empire and he realized overlooking the possibility that two performers who are hardly monogamous might not be paragons of HIV-negative virtue was a chance to make yet another buck. Of course since he also uses sugardaddy’s money to bankroll right-wing causes and support anti-gay politicians, no doubt he’ll put his filthy lucre to good use. And no doubt he’ll soon find other porn-star “couples” to do more bareback scenes that he can market as being different from all those he has been flapping those gigantic hypocritical lips about for at least a decade.
The biggest issue in regards to a monogamous relationship is trust. If two people decide to be monogamous and only have sex with each other and are both negative, then that is their private decision. That being said, I have had two close friends who both were in committed relationships and made this decision only to get infected by their cheating partners. One is now in a new relationship with another HIV-positive guy. The other, tragically, did not find out until his partner of 5 years got sick with an AIDS-related illness and he discovered his partner had forged his test results and been hiding his health issues in an elaborate scam. He became very depressed and wound up committing suicide a few months after his partner died. All I can say is that if you are going to take the risk, truly know the person who you are with before you make the decision.
does anyone else notice that lil speck of shit on the dripping cum in the last picture?
Should straight couples use condoms too…. NO because then there would never be any more children born. Why are gay committed couple any different?