The Cock Buffet: Brought To You By The Jizzy Holes & Well-Endowed Boys Of Bel Ami

45 thoughts on “The Cock Buffet: Brought To You By The Jizzy Holes & Well-Endowed Boys Of Bel Ami”

1. Uh, that’s exactly how you started this piece. 🙂

   Once upon a time, Bel Ami VHS tapes were my coveted, much loved possessions. Glad to see not much has changed.

   And I’m sure you’ll cum up with something to top us all off tomorrow.

2. They look so different.

3. Too many video’s taking forever to get through them all the lip of my desk and my underwear is covered in precum! Still have not figured out how to tell my cock to stop rubbing the desk.

4. WOW!

5. When I envision Gay Heaven – which is pretty much just regular Heaven with a better soundtrack and a swim-up bar – I imagine the helpful little angels (the “customer service” sort, not the “rain of fire” variety) as looking a lot like these guys. I find it really difficult to understand why I didn’t think they were half as sexy when I was younger.

6. ….and i wonder how many of these gorgeous, beautiful, young and sweet boys will end up positive…oh well it doesn’t really matter..the movies are HOT HOT HOT !

7. Yeah, the “rain of fire” variety will be the ones in leather harnesses.

8. this is dad heaven!!!! all those magnificent boys great cum shots great bodies great cocks – please send me a ticket to watch them live!

9. The only thing I don’t like about Bel Ami is the intense need for perfect faces/poses. Some of the guys are either really done up with make up or every shot is a model’s pose with pursed lips and bright eyes. I mean, gorgeous, but I feel less like I’m looking at porn and more like I’m looking at a cologne ad.

10. That and/or military-drag. Still fun at parties, but not quite as approachable.

11. i could not get through all of he clips. But, not to worry, I will be back . . . and then back again and again. This is a set of clips I am sure I will never tire of. I will be torn when I can’t check them out any more.

12. “Clever” 😉

13. I agree, but I’m not sure that it’s Bel Ami doing it more than other studios. All of them have their performers doing it for the camera, everything arranged just so, airbrushed and made up to create that image of fantasy. It just happens that Bel Ami’s young men are so Gosh-darned pretty that they can’t help but look that way. Making them seem natural is probably about as difficult as making a basket of kittens seem threatening.

    I mentioned earlier that it wasn’t until recently that I found their models attractive, and I think the reason is equal parts evolution of Bel Ami’s aesthetic over the years (it’s far less plastic now than it used to be), and my own realization as I matured that older men are just older, not necessarily better, wiser, or more attractive just because they’ve lived longer. I don’t mean that in a pejorative way at all – I love me some older men, and they’ll always have a special place in my heart. But men are men are men, and the whole age-difference thing has kinda lost its mystique for me.

14. I want to go to this “dad heaven” that you speak of.

15. Shhhh. Don’t tell it to stop that fun instead film it and share it!

16. but true eh?

17. True, if they’re sharing needles, having bareback sex with an HIV-positive individual or engaging in otherwise risky behavior off camera.

    While I don’t know the exact intricacies of Bel Ami’s testing policies, they’re too big of a company to risk putting their performers in danger. Chances are, all of these models were tested vigorously beforehand. The majority of studios, especially the bigger ones, use sero-sorting, condoms or, in some cases, a ban on HIV-positive performers to prevent infection.

    My point here isn’t to defend the studios decision to go primarily bareback, but to point out that HIV isn’t going to magically materialize between two presumably HIV negative men fucking without a condom. It’s also weird that you assume they aren’t already positive. Why?

    Yes, I realize there are windows and other risk factors to take into consideration, but it veers into troublesome and pozphobic territory when you start assuming ANYONE who barebacks a few times is inevitably going to become HIV-positive. That is the only point I’m trying to make here.

    For you, I could see how it’d be equally troublesome that someone watching this might get the wrong impression, forgo a condom just ONCE under the wrong circumstances and live with HIV for the rest of his life, just because Bel Ami made it look “hot”.

    PS: I am going to regret opening this can of worms.

18. Interesting that you didn’t use the term “gay face” this time, yet somehow managed to express the same sentiment. Did somebody actually learn his lesson from the last comment thread?

19. ugh u wanna let it go or are u just looking for a fight? and i dont think they have gay face i think they are just dolled up. big difference considering one keeps its masculinity. dewitt, i really dont respect you, but i didnt come here to discuss that. i came to give my opinion on this post. that alright with you?

20. Who’s fighting? I am congratulating you on learning to use words to express your opinions, instead of resorting to offensive, tired slurs!

    Sure, you might have some fucked up ideas about masculinity, but we can take this all one step at a time…

21. LOL Michael

22. oh no see “doesnt match ur opinion” and “fucked up” dont mean the same thing. but here is a phrase that is never taken wrong….

    fuck you.

23. Awwww, c’mon! Where’s the love?

    Elliott, and correct me if I’m wrong – like I could stop you, lol – I see that you feel that make-up, exaggerated poses, and efforts to preen for a camera are not masculine, and at some extremes, are offensive to you, because they conform to a cartoonish stereotype of “gay” appearance. Does that sound right?

24. :: Waves his hands excitedly! ::

    Can I be Anachronistic Viewpoint #1? I’ve defended liberty too often, I’m afraid I may lose my bastard cred.

25. Or maybe your “opinion” is just fucked up and guided by bizarre social norms you’ve come to accept.

    Or maybe your “opinion” makes you sound like an asshole, and I’m trying to help you out by convincing you to be a less caustic, judgmental person.

    Maybe! But it’s far more likely that I’m just causing a fight for the sake of causing a fight.

    (Thanks for helping my blog out by raising the comment count with every one of your incoherent responses, by the way.)

26. Do what you need to do, my dear.

    (I should become one of those bloggers who doesn’t read his comment section, now that I’m thinking about it.)

27. That’s like being a blind gardener. Sad, but somewhat poetic.

28. Dewitt, I’ve agreed with a lot of the things that you’ve expressed on this blog until now. But this… This permissive and even affirmative stance you’ve taken on bareback sex is a bridge too damned far. Do you just hate younger people, and want them to get sick with a disease that will totally destroy every good thing they’ve ever had, as well as their future? Should they, in an effort to continue to find work, infect other stars and random individuals the way Marc Wallice, Darren James, Derrick Burts, Cameron Bay, Rod Daily, and the growing list of probably positive performers – Just last week we saw Christopher Daniels get infected (maybe), and that one kid who allegedly got fucked by fifteen dudes, along with Devin “Dick Dynasty” Totter, who is either over or short half a chromosome, if looks are to be believed.

    Those men and women are dead to us – and yet their lifestyles (until the moment they passed on their vile sickness) included regimens of rigorous testing, sero-sorting, and other commonly used risk reduction methods. Obviously, these methods don’t work. And with the dissolution of AIM three years ago, it appears no central regulatory group is working to protect the interests of the healthy members of this industry.

    And obviously HIV doesn’t just “magically” appear during sex. I find it insulting that you would even suggest your readership is so ignorant as to how HIV is spread that we might believe such a thing. But tests aren’t always correct, and it’s possible for unethical performers and testing companies to engage in tampering with samples. It therefore stands to reason that, just as in the real world, we should never assume that a performer is HIV-negative – and I DO ASSUME that they’re HIV-positive, thank you very much. I ask that you stop trying to mislead us into a false perception of safety in these actors’ activities.

    The truth is, if these impressionable kids are taught by Big Evil Porn Studios to engage in bareback sex, they WILL get HIV if they don’t already have it. It’s reasonable to assume that this sort of disgusting behavior extends into their private lives as well. And there’s nothing wrong with being poz-phobic. I’m afraid of cancer, brain damage, and dying in a fire, so why shouldn’t I be afraid of walking disease vectors whose exposure to an increasingly permissive and deceptive message from a risk-ignorant society makes them all too eager to try and infect ME with their lethal, nauseating species of sickness? It’s bad enough they chose to become dirty, now they’re putting everyone else’s life at risk, and siphoning off my tax dollars to pay for their treatment.

    No, it’s not “equally troublesome” that someone might be zealous in avoiding HIV, and someone might be infected by it. That’s like saying that routine handwashing is as troublesome as getting the flu. You clearly have no respect for the death and devastation this plague has caused in the last thirty-five years. Shame on you. Shame…

    Also, I’d appreciate it if you didn’t characterize your opposition as “worms.” We’re people, just like your parents tried to raise you to be.

29. Not until the second date, sunshine.

    (Sorry. Couldn’t keep the snark bottled up any longer.)

30. sadly, yes.

31. Dewitt, you really have degenerated into a bully here…take a step back and see that…

32. THAT is the most powerful and meaningful thing you’ve written on these blogs. i hope Dewitt takes notice…You’ve summed up exactly what myself and other MH readers have been so frustrated with. Thank you for contributing that.

33. please take over this blog, cause i could read ur work for hours. that was very insightful and affective

34. Agreed. You can’t help or convince someone to be a less caustic, judgmental person by being one.

35. whats this christopher daniels thing youre talking about? what happened?

36. And there are ways to deal with bullies. Since you can’t change ’em, don’t even try. Just ignore them and pay them no mind. For a blogger that means not reading his blogs nor even hitting his website. That’s exactly what I’m doing effective now.

37. Well said! 😉

38. So it’s called having an “opinion” when you all speak up, but when I decide to respond, I’m a “bully”? This doesn’t make much sense.

39. Attaboy, fulminate, fulminate, fulminate!
    For good measure, add an ad hominem attack. Dewitt said he was opening a can of worms, he didn’t refer to his detractors as worms.

    The various posts here have attracted every pro/con opinion on barebacking and I don’t think ANYONE’S approach to it will change based on these posts.

40. Of course it will! Really, all I can hope to do is plant a seed. And I’m not finished; since I seem to have found traction (and an opponent), I feel like I might just expound upon my previous statement, and tell everyone how I really feel about the issue. But that’s going to take a while. I’ve been watching Doctor Who instead of thinking over how to construct an unassailable argument, mainly because I wasn’t expecting anyone to have the balls to speak out. Shit, another ad hominem. Oh well, nothing for it. Stay tuned for an update; it’ll be a hoot.

41. I’m not surprised at the people who up-voted this post (see image; now that a response that appears considered is called for, I expect we’ll be seeing Lois in place of some other commenter) – I basically just rephrased their statements, and added a few fact-based deceptions to give it some apparent legitimacy. For my next trick, I was going to directly quote Hitler’s speeches (Health and Culture for Blood and Race), and swap out “Jew”/”Jewry” for some nasty epithet about HIV-positive people. I’m quite confident that would have won higher praise from the sociopathic set, but after reading some, I realized I don’t need more moral contamination in my life – I’ve got you guys, for better or worse. My aim was/is “inflicted insight,” my favorite form of attack on people who pretend to a sense of social justice or compassion for others.

    So, the next time you meet someone with HIV, remember to tell them that you think they’re vile, disgusting, walking disease vectors, not people. Not once in that post that you enjoyed so much did I call them people. You believe that these unfortunate men and women are sub-human, and celebrate when others show the same “insight” you do. By your own agreement, you believe people who have this disease are already dead to humanity, so I suppose the sky’s the limit for how cruel you could actually be. Really: I encourage you to show the same hate to a single person in real life that you do for this entire class of people. Any friends you might have lost to this disease, you should probably call their families to let them know how you really feel, because you just showed us exactly how that is.

    I submit that it is you who are sub-human; your utter lack of compassion, sublimated murderousness, and broken, self-centered logic means that I don’t actually need to quote Hitler here; your behavior defines the sort of reasoned, casual cruelty, disregard, and delusional moralizing that characterized the man’s actions. Just remember, in your day to day, that you are not immune from becoming the very thing you fear and hate most. If by some terribly ironic circumstance, any of you should contract HIV (it will, of course, be your fault regardless of circumstance), I encourage you to have the moral fortitude to kill yourselves as soon as possible. After all, it’s the only sensible thing to do, right? Not wasting our money, breathing our air, risking the health of others, or otherwise polluting the universe with your continued existence.

    Frankly, I’m shocked that it took as long as it did for someone to say something; I did assume that someone would have some balls. I had hoped to engage in an argument which exhausted every possible defense for the kind of cruelty that is apparently alive and well in the community, before doing, well, this. I’m less surprised that you folks would accept an apparent about-face in my entire ideology. Since I can only hope that you’re members of a dying minority, the prospect of a new convert must have lead you to overlook pretty much everything I’ve ever posted before now, the way degenerate hill-folk would overlook a few missing features just to fuck someone outside of their own immediate family. Compassion, empathy, the desire for equality, and the sensibility to justice are not small things; they are the qualities which distinguish us from monsters, qualities which you lack.

    To anyone who was offended by the statements in the previous posts, I do very deeply apologize; they were intended only to illustrate the destructive stereotypes which still exist in this community. Back to the regularly scheduled defense of human rights and personal dignity. George, I congratulate you on having those balls. Cheers!

    P.S.: I always wanted to use that “can of worms” pun/jab. I’m surprised that idiom doesn’t offend more non-native English speakers.

42. Geez, he didn’t call you worms. It’s a phrase that’s often used to refer to a difficult / complicated subject. Urban dictionary: “can of worms. A tricky situation which requires much effort to resolve.”

43. Easy, tiger. It was a joke; icing on a cake intended to expose the awful thinking that some people have about their fellow human beings.

    I sometimes make puns. It’s hit-or-miss.

44. That one was definitely a miss, miss-trust. Your attempt at argument by playing the devil’s advocate the way that you did was also rather distasteful. Maybe try a different angle next time you insist on ‘creatively’ making a point.

45. I don’t see how holding a mirror to my opposition is distasteful. I did nothing aside from (very tightly) paraphrase their own statements and sentiments, then carry them to the logical conclusion that anyone who faithfully holds such a belief would be compelled to reach.

    Is it distasteful to know that there’s a substantial portion of our community that believes HIV-positive people should receive no assistance from anyone – knowing, as they do, what the progression of that illness looks like? Is it distasteful that a person’s (likely unintentional) acquisition of a disease could, in the eyes of some of the very same individuals who go on about being culture-warriors and soldiers for the social good, effectively negate the man or woman’s existence before they ever experience death? Is it distasteful to see that there exists among our own peers a fraction, however small, which believes, sincerely, that a thing which is barely itself alive, and certainly incapable of morality, can make another human being inherently immoral, and undeserving of compassion?

    Of course. It’s the epitome of dehumanization, and the kind of thinking which historically has led to the slaughter of millions. I’m sorry if you feel it’s distasteful to call people out on it using whatever methods are expedient. I’ve tried others to no avail. I consider their statements no less distasteful than waking up to find a burning cross in my neighbor’s yard, or a swastika painted on the door of the local synagogue. These are members of our community who plead for equality when it suits them, but believe that some of us are less equal than others. I realize I can not “win,” insofar as no one’s mind is changed, bigotry doesn’t die, and we continue to have this debate. But if I can’t win, I can condemn them in the strongest possible terms, and oppose their beliefs with every means at my disposal, whether or not it may be pretty.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.