Whenever someone who doesn’t look like an Abercrombie, Randy Blue or Andrew Christian model tops The Ten, people automatically assume the results were rigged. We can assure you that’s not the case! Anthony London won this week’s ultimate title fair and square (except for the whole “five pictures” thing).
Sure, he may have benefited from the new rules, which allow readers to vote for as many contestants as they’d like, as many times as they’d like… But every contestant was subject to those rules! The playing field was pretty much even.
The playing field, however, was not very kind to previous champions Bo Roberts and Andrew Jakk, as well as newer competitors like Josey Greenwell, Dionis Cenusa and Matthew Stephen Herrick. These five men failed to gain enough support from their fans, so we have no choice but to wave “goodbye” to them with our penises.
For those of you who are just joining us, here’s how the game works! Each week, we’ll feature ten extremely sexy men to choose from. You can vote for up to two of these guys as many contestants as you’d like, and only the five with the highest amount of votes will move on to the next round. The remaining five slots will be filled the following week by men who you’ve suggested, as well as a handful of attractive fellows selected by your favorite bloggers (that would be us).
To keep things interesting, each participant will be retired after ten weeks on the charts. They have the opportunity of returning in the future, provided that they produce another hot video, photo shoot or anything worthy of a Manhunt Daily post.
Now let’s forget about the rules for a second and focus on what really matters–who should be on top next week? You have until next Tuesday to pick your two favorite contestants, so hop to it and make your vote count!
– Dewitt
To view this week’s rankings and cast your vote, follow the JUMP:
In the grand tradition of ten words or less…
1. ANTHONY LONDON (LW – 10, W2): Suck on this, chiseled pretty boys! Anthony London’s on top.
2. COLBY MELVIN (LW – 1, W10, RETIRED): Don’t worry, guys! You haven’t see the last of him.
3. LUKE MILAN (LW – 6, W2): Like ’em big? Then you should consider voting for Luke.
4. DEAN MONROE (LW – 3, W3): At forty years, he’s hotter than all of your faves.
5. TOBY HART (LW – 2, W4): Remember when Willy Wonka made wallpaper you could taste? Yeah.
6. JUSTIN CLYNES (RETURN): He’s serving up pure, unfiltered sex with that happy trail.
7. JEFF GRANT (DEBUT): We didn’t notice his gigantic nipples before today. Pretty cool.
8. MARC SINOWAY (DEBUT): You might know him better as “Tommy” from Hunting Season.
9. DZMITRY PATUK (DEBUT): Holy fucking abs, Batman! We are pretty much speechless. Ugh.
10. TROY DUMAIS (DEBUT): It’s all about the bulge. The legs ain’t bad either.
___________________________________________________________
Vote for as many contestants as you’d like, as many times as you’d like!
Sorry, but the “vote as many times as you’d like” basically means whoever votes as much and who has the most time on their hands, picks the winner. It sort of takes objectivity by a group of people out of the equation, and lets one, or a small group of people, pick the winner. I voted for Colby repeatedly, I won’t lie, but the way the votes jumped all over the place and so dramatically proves this isn’t affair contest anymore. Drop this flawed new system, because it’s just gonna be the same guy for ten weeks in a row now. Just watch…
Sorry, but the “vote as many times as you’d like” basically means whoever votes as much and who has the most time on their hands, picks the winner. It sort of takes objectivity by a group of people out of the equation, and lets one, or a small group of people, pick the winner. I voted for Colby repeatedly, I won’t lie, but the way the votes jumped all over the place and so dramatically proves this isn’t affair contest anymore. Drop this flawed new system, because it’s just gonna be the same guy for ten weeks in a row now. Just watch…
I’m not in favor of power voting. I mean like maybe a couple times, but not mucho bunches. How the hell did Andrew Jakk get booted? He was ahead last I had looked.
I live in a swing state and only wish I could vote repeatedly for the presidential candidate of my choice (President Obama, that is). But I do agree with the others who feel that this new system of limitless voting isn’t right and doesn’t yield–dare I use the Faux News phrase–a fair and balanced selection of the real favorites.
I live in a swing state and only wish I could vote repeatedly for the presidential candidate of my choice (President Obama, that is). But I do agree with the others who feel that this new system of limitless voting isn’t right and doesn’t yield–dare I use the Faux News phrase–a fair and balanced selection of the real favorites.
Another way of changing up the voting is to allow people a certain number of votes–say, 3-5–that they can use however they choose. Vote three times for one guy, or for three different guys. (Cluster voting, it’s called. Lani Guinier argued for it as a way of protecting minorities in democratic process.)
And, as an aside, I never understood the appeal of Colby.
All I see always on the Top is a Big Dick… How basic is the gay community these days :/
I feel bad, maybe I’m just weird and they are normal…
you are,we are. 🙂
you are,we are. 🙂
I never understood those who didn’t understand the appeal of Colby. I would have used all three votes on him – once for the eyes, once for the ass, and once for the eyes – wait…
I never understood those who didn’t understand the appeal of Colby. I would have used all three votes on him – once for the eyes, once for the ass, and once for the eyes – wait…
Where did Colby go? I couldn’t vote for him and I wanted to.
It’s a countdown of the sexiest men. I think you’re taking it a little too seriously…
It’s a countdown of the sexiest men. I think you’re taking it a little too seriously…
It’s a countdown of the sexiest men. I think you’re taking it a little too seriously…
He was retired after ten weeks on the countdown!
He was retired after ten weeks on the countdown!
He was retired after ten weeks on the countdown!
There is always one each week that doesn’t read the text. Colby was on the list for 10 weeks, therefore he has been retired.
There is always one each week that doesn’t read the text. Colby was on the list for 10 weeks, therefore he has been retired.
There is always one each week that doesn’t read the text. Colby was on the list for 10 weeks, therefore he has been retired.
Troy Dumais is HOT!!!!! His has brothers and they are equally HOT!! One of his brorthers was in the military and he has muscles upon muscles.
I kinda prefer that tops have big dicks. 🙂
I kinda prefer that tops have big dicks. 🙂
True but he does make a good point. Our votes aren’t equal any more because of the “too much time on my hands” factor. 2 per person was the better system.
True but he does make a good point. Our votes aren’t equal any more because of the “too much time on my hands” factor. 2 per person was the better system.
Dewitt, rather than offering a sarcastic and judgmental remark, maybe you should consider that most of the remarks here, from your readers who are essentially your customers and are the reason you get paid to be a blogger in the first place, are suggesting they don’t like this new system. That being the case, it might be more helpful if you actually listened to our concerns and at least considered them. I worked in retail for over ten years and had to deal with complaints on a constant basis. If I had had your cavalier attitude, I would have been fired.
You’re right of course that this is “just a countdown” and shouldn’t be taken too seriously, and yet it is a popular feature on this blog and it is what you get paid to do and why a lot of your readers come to this site. Belittling our concerns and opinions isn’t a good way to encourage us to continue to come here. If you want us to just “shut up or leave”, you’re doing a good job of it. I don’t think my initial comment was in any way insulting or mean-spirited like many comments in blogs tend to be which I feel you have every right to call people out on. This was simply a valid concern about what many of us feel is a flawed system, and I would appreciate it if you would seriously consider your readers’ concerns. Thank you.
i do like that you have placed thumbnails of the “contestants” under their respective check|boxes — that is very helpful, since i’m not too keen on remembering the names and faces of so many guys whom i’ll likely never meet anyway.
on the other hand, i could consider it a misstep, allowing limitless voting for every candidate: you may not have considered the possibility, that some people have multiple devices (each with unique IP Addresses obviously) with which they may access this site, all within easy reach; i happen to have three such “computers,” myself.
if i were so inclined i could have “gamed the system” a little without too much effort before the new rules took effect..
..currently, in theory, i can have thrice the ability to boost a given contestant, should i be so inclined, until i’m blue in the balls (i’m not).
i really think that you should just let us vote for as many guys as we want, and that’s it; hopefully the number of sensible voters will outweigh the number of santorummy voters out there, dewitt.
for example: only one guy appeals to me (try guessing whom), and i voted as such.
easy.
Graphicjack, I’ve always appreciated your feedback, and I didn’t realize how bitchy my response came off until I reread it just now.
Please realize that I’m taking this criticism into account.
Graphicjack, I’ve always appreciated your feedback, and I didn’t realize how bitchy my response came off until I reread it just now.
Please realize that I’m taking this criticism into account.
Graphicjack, I’ve always appreciated your feedback, and I didn’t realize how bitchy my response came off until I reread it just now.
Please realize that I’m taking this criticism into account.
Although I highly agree that the new system of voting is more flawed, I think it’s most important to say that I *personally* think a post on this site should either thought provoking in a gay community sense or, more commonly, boner inducing.
Which is why I would also say…lighten up. On this subject at least.
like an old bf used to say “there are 2 things I hate – size queens and small cocks” Not to get all margaret mead on you, but it perhaps is a biological response – even though rationally we know that our sex is not a means for procreation, we may still subconsciously be choosing which mates we think give us the best chance of planting that seed…………and they are so damn fun to play with besides. ;o)
Couldn’t agree more. If there were money, prizes or a title on the line, multiple votes would spoil the integrity of the system. But this is an entertainment blog, not life and death.
Couldn’t agree more. If there were money, prizes or a title on the line, multiple votes would spoil the integrity of the system. But this is an entertainment blog, not life and death.
The voting method aside, I gotta say I just love your use (and was it your invention?) of the adjective “santorummy.” So perfect.
Let’s forward this new form of the word on to the likes of Dan Savage and Stephen Colbert, shall we? I’m sure they could make good use of it. And, as with the noun on which it’s based, everytime it cums to be used, its namesake defeated senator and failed presidential candidate will be remembered for the piece of shit that he is.
The voting method aside, I gotta say I just love your use (and was it your invention?) of the adjective “santorummy.” So perfect.
Let’s forward this new form of the word on to the likes of Dan Savage and Stephen Colbert, shall we? I’m sure they could make good use of it. And, as with the noun on which it’s based, everytime it cums to be used, its namesake defeated senator and failed presidential candidate will be remembered for the piece of shit that he is.
it just came to me.
i had a moment of inspiration.
thank you, Commenter.
i’d feel honoured if either of those two adopted my variation for their own usage.
anything, to help continue castigating and denigrating that repugancant prig, dick santorum.
it just came to me.
i had a moment of inspiration.
thank you, Commenter.
i’d feel honoured if either of those two adopted my variation for their own usage.
anything, to help continue castigating and denigrating that repugancant prig, dick santorum.
it just came to me.
i had a moment of inspiration.
thank you, Commenter.
i’d feel honoured if either of those two adopted my variation for their own usage.
anything, to help continue castigating and denigrating that repugancant prig, dick santorum.
it just came to me.
i had a moment of inspiration.
thank you, Commenter.
i’d feel honoured if either of those two adopted my variation for their own usage.
anything, to help continue castigating and denigrating that repugancant prig, dick santorum.
it just came to me.
i had a moment of inspiration.
thank you, Commenter.
i’d feel honoured if either of those two adopted my variation for their own usage.
anything, to help continue castigating and denigrating that repugancant prig, dick santorum.
it just came to me.
i had a moment of inspiration.
thank you, Commenter.
i’d feel honoured if either of those two adopted my variation for their own usage.
anything, to help continue castigating and denigrating that repugancant prig, dick santorum.
it just came to me.
i had a moment of inspiration.
thank you, Commenter.
i’d feel honoured if either of those two adopted my variation for their own usage.
anything, to help continue castigating and denigrating that repugancant prig, dick santorum.