The Ten: The Laws Have Changed (Again)

photo

We might be stubborn, but we’re not stupid! After listening to your complaints on last week’s edition of The Ten, we put an end to the “vote as many times as you’d like” part of our experimental system. You’re right. The Sexiest Man of The Moment should not be determined by the number of times one man can click over and over and over and… Well, you get the point.

Beyond that, we can’t help but wonder if Justin Clynes, Jeff Grant, Marc Sinoway or Dzmitry Patuk would have had a better chance if the old rules were still in place. All four men failed to gain enough votes on last week’s poll, so we unfortunately have to send them packing. We wish them luck in their future endeavors of sexiness.

For those of you who are just joining us, here’s how the game works! Each week, we’ll feature ten extremely sexy men to choose from. You can vote for as many contestants as you’d like, and only the five with the highest amount of votes will move on to the next round. The remaining five slots will be filled the following week by men who you’ve suggested, as well as a handful of attractive fellows selected by your favorite bloggers (that would be us).

To keep things interesting, each participant will be retired after ten weeks on the charts. They have the opportunity of returning in the future, provided that they produce another hot video, photo shoot or anything worthy of a Manhunt Daily post.

Now let’s forget about the rules for a second and focus on what really matters–who should be on top next week? You have until next Tuesday to pick your two favorite contestants, so hop to it and make your vote count!

– Dewitt

To view this week’s rankings and cast your vote, follow the JUMP:

In the grand tradition of ten words or less…

photo

1. ANTHONY LONDON (LW – 1, W3): Can he still win the race without the unlimited voting?

photo

2. LUKE MILAN (LW – 3, W3): Maybe Luke will finally hit number one this week! Maybe.

young hung masculine jock.

3. TOBY HART (LW – 5, W5): Almost sexier than the shot with cum on his abs…

photo

4. DEAN MONROE (LW – 4, W4): And he’ll stay just as hard while you’re fucking him!

photo

5. TROY DUMAIS (LW – 10, W2): We’re keeping this GIF, because you should see both sides.

photo

6. RYAN TERRY (DEBUT): A chiseled muscle god, for your viewing (and masturbatory) pleasure.

photo

7. NICCO SKY (RETURN): Do you see that beautiful rump? It deserves first place!

Shawn Roberts shirtless fashion spread

8. SHAWN ROBERTS (DEBUT): A hot “celeb” less obvious than JGL or Hugh Jackman.

gay oral sex, head, sucking, blown, Vinny Castillo

9. VINNY CASTILLO (RETURN): A surefire nominee for 2012’s “Get Inside Me Now” award.

Southern Strokes model Carter

10. CARTER (DEBUT): He and Toby are on the same site. Friendly competition!

___________________________________________________________


606 thoughts on “The Ten: The Laws Have Changed (Again)

  1. lol everyone has had sex with anthony london in the fitness first covent garden sauna!!!

  2. One of my several votes had to be for Dean Monroe. Not only is he sizzingly hot at the ripe young age of 40, but I also loved the caption beneath his pic.

  3. Thank you for changing the rules back. I for one appreciate it. Let’s kiss and make up, Dewitt. 🙂

  4. “More better”? There are 2 old sayings. One about a pot & kettle, & another about glass houses & stones. Look them up, think about them before correcting others.

  5. “More better”? There are 2 old sayings. One about a pot & kettle, & another about glass houses & stones. Look them up, think about them before correcting others.

  6. I NEVER vote for prostitutes, luckily the two guys I really
    liked also happened to be the only two non-prostitutes being presented. You’ve
    got it: My votes go to Ryan Terry & Shawn Roberts.

    BTW I’m only expressing my opinion and it’s in no way
    intended as an insult to anyone or to sway others to my way of thinking. So
    PLEASE don’t get your knickers in a twist!

  7. I NEVER vote for prostitutes, luckily the two guys I really
    liked also happened to be the only two non-prostitutes being presented. You’ve
    got it: My votes go to Ryan Terry & Shawn Roberts.

    BTW I’m only expressing my opinion and it’s in no way
    intended as an insult to anyone or to sway others to my way of thinking. So
    PLEASE don’t get your knickers in a twist!

  8. So we shouldn’t get our knickers in a twist about you referring to 8 guys in the top 10 as prostitutes – seriously??

  9. Why should we get our knickers in a twist because you feel the need to be judgmental and call it an opinion? It’s a free world. If you believe that your statements will get our knickers twisted, clearly you understand the judgmental tone of them and if you choose to not edit yourself when you get that feeling, well that’s your choice. Interesting that you believe a model isn’t a “prostitute” because he certainly seems to be selling his body…but you know, whatever gets you through the day.

  10. Dumb is a treatable condition, being human is not. (Though some sub-human conditions need treatment, but subjective.)

  11. Dumb is a treatable condition, being human is not. (Though some sub-human conditions need treatment, but subjective.)

  12. I do recognize sarcasm. I don’t care if this sarcasm or not. He’s correcting someone on grammar but messes up himself? If he was trying to be funny it’s a miss.

    Besides, a sarcastic joke doesn’t include the target in on the joke. It is harshness & negative towards the target.

    @b35664f6f59e3c2994f4928e99eb57da:disqus
    If it was intended as a joke, I truly apologize!

  13. I do recognize sarcasm. I don’t care if this sarcasm or not. He’s correcting someone on grammar but messes up himself? If he was trying to be funny it’s a miss.

    Besides, a sarcastic joke doesn’t include the target in on the joke. It is harshness & negative towards the target.

    @b35664f6f59e3c2994f4928e99eb57da:disqus
    If it was intended as a joke, I truly apologize!

  14. so…who do you jerk off to? Sports figures? The weather man? Other people innocently doing some other media gig that isn’t inherently sexual in nature? That would be an interesting choice. To eskew adult entertainers who invite your lust, and then spend your fantasies on someone doing something totally sexually unrelated.
    And, I’m not judging you, I’m just curious and find it very potentially ironic. Actually it’s probably just ironic, you are on porn blog.

  15. so…who do you jerk off to? Sports figures? The weather man? Other people innocently doing some other media gig that isn’t inherently sexual in nature? That would be an interesting choice. To eskew adult entertainers who invite your lust, and then spend your fantasies on someone doing something totally sexually unrelated.
    And, I’m not judging you, I’m just curious and find it very potentially ironic. Actually it’s probably just ironic, you are on porn blog.

  16. @ Raveltrouser; Michael and Rob

    Hmmm interesting. I’ve NEVER thought of MH as a pornblog to
    me it’s more of a hook-up site that also features topics to entertain members
    [music, celebrities etc and yes adult movies]

    I don’t watch porn, actually the last time I’ve watched a
    porno was probably ± 8 years ago. It might be me but I found them very
    predictable and many just turned me off [I’m NOT into kinky stuff, spit or
    piss]

    Who do I jerk off to?? Honestly? I hardly ever need to since
    my boyfriend and I live together and we’re rather evenly matched when it comes
    to our sex drive but when I do it’s not about a fantasy but more about the
    pleasure I give myself and at “le moment supreme” I tend to envision my
    boyfriend [I guess most of you will find that’s boring] I’m extremely
    monogamous and thus when I’m with somebody I tend NOT to think of other men in
    a sexual way [incomprehensible according to my best friend but alas that’s the
    way I’m wired]

    As to why I asked you NOT to get your knickers in a twist,
    or why I don’t feel the need to “edit” myself let alone [despite what Michael
    implied] think of my point of view as JUDGMENTAL is because I have noticed a
    trend amongst many a member of MH that the moment anyone expresses an opinion
    that is the opposite of yours they are accused of being Judgmental, narrow
    minded or bigoted. I don’t swoon over or worship at the feet of those who earn
    a living having sex. I think they have the right to live their lives the way
    they please and earn a living in anyway they choose. I don’t think they are
    harming anybody but neither do I think that it’s an edifying, enriching or
    empowering profession.

    The thing that cracks me up is that each of you who has
    taken offence to my expressed opinion choose to forget that according to Websters
    dictionary the definition of prostitution is:
    “the act or practice of engaging
    in promiscuous sexual relations especially for money”

    Isn’t that the essence of working in the
    porn industry? BTW that is NOT what a “regular” model does.

  17. Rowin, I don’t choose to forget anything. I understand the essentials. Someone working in adult entertainment is being paid for performing sexual acts. What you seem to choose to forget is that you’re on a blog that “worships at the feet of those who earn a living having sex.” but you claim you’re here for the articles but not the centerfolds.
    You NEVER thought of there being porn involved, you NEVER vote for prostitutes, you NEVER think of anyone other than your partner. You’re hard wired for monogomy and commenting on the official blog for a casual sex website…you see what I’m getting at?
    You come across like you’re under the impression that you’re quite a bit better than every one else that participates in this forum.
    And yeah, you’ve got an opinion. But see, the question was, “Who do you think is hot?” you answer is Ryan Terry and Shawn Roberts. You chose to share your motivation, and your reasoning, which revealed a very black and white moralistic view and laud yourself above others. You state it’s an opinion believing that this is somehow sancrosanct, it’s not.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.