In my experience, putting a photo in black and white will automatically make it seem less slutty. I've taken pics where I'm on all fours and converted them, and guys have e-mailed me to tell me how "artsy" they are. What the fuck? I'm trying to get some cock in my hole, not get an exhibition in MoMA. Oddly enough, these guys found the artsiness attractive. And then I got some cock in my hole.
Hell, I've taken even sleazier photos and folks have considered them artistic. For some reason, we tend to associate black and white photography with something a little more innocent. It also has a tendency to call to mind vintage porn, giving an air of nostalgia.
I've tried to demonstrate this effect on a photo above, but you'll need to see a dirtier photo to really catch the difference. Yes, a cock next to a hungry hole doesn't automatically become "art" when you take down the saturation, but it definitely takes down the "I'm a cock-whore" factor. I'll let you decide whether that's a good thing.
– Dewitt
Photo credit: Dirty Boy Video
To check out another photo converted, follow the JUMP:
*Stabs his eyes out*
the bottom in both the black and white and the color photos looks as though he hasn’t douched properly. eugh definitely not artsy in either one more like dirty and disgusting. The poor top
I don’t see it. I suppose it takes away a touch of the realism for enhanced clarity, but it still just looks like B/W porn to me.
The first picture not the one with the gross fucking thing, but what does that kid have on his ass crap?
Maybe he should have used photoshop to get rid of that rather than black and white
LOL&LOL @ 007of11
black and white always wins.
in a group of coloured photos only.
Black and white also gets rid of alot of imperfections
You’re right…. it’s “artsier” lol!!!!
Rembrandt, Mona Lisa that’s art this is some dirty smuck getting ready 2 take a dick up his hairy ass !!!