Don’t ask me why Yohann Banks has been pegged as a “power bottom werewolf”. It’s just who he is, you guys! On top of that, this day has felt extraordinarily long for me, and I’m running out of ways to objectify gay porn stars and call them “hot”. You would understand if it was your job to look at gorgeous men all day. Eventually, you just want to throw your hands up and say, “Can’t I just stop thinking about WORDS and masturbate in peace?”
In all seriousness, though, there’s got to be something supernatural going on in this picture of Yohann Banks, right? I’ve got a theory that it’s a demon – a horny demon! Nuh, something isn’t right there… It’s much more likely that the sensation of Michel Rudin‘s cum on his torso transformed him into a raging power bottom werewolf who will stop at nothing to ride your cock.
Lock your doors! Hide your husbands! Yohann is coming to bring you intense amounts of pleasure with his beefy ass, and you’re going to love every second of it. You better hope that power bottom werewolves don’t travel in packs, because you won’t have enough dicks to fuck all of them. They might get rowdy and start fighting over who gets to ride first! (Yohann would win, obviously.)
– Dewitt
Photo credit: Alpha Males
Check out Yohann getting fucked by Michel Rudin below:
See even more of this power bottom werewolf in action at ALPHA MALES.
_______________________________________________________________________________
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE…
–
–
Gorgeous guy!!!
Yeah, it’s like a holiday on here to see two tat-free guys going at it!
It sure is terrible when someone does to their body what they want, isn’t it? Damn selfish of them to not consider your feelings…
Am I the only one worried that they might crash the glass desk top?
I’d love a piece of that dude…
I agree, they are gorgeous. nice bodies, no distracting ink. um um good. I wonder what their personalities are like.
I think the commenter was celebrating the fact that these two guys are obviously not being swept into the omnipresent body-art fad that makes so many of these muscled porn-studs look like greek statues that have been tastelessly defaced by graffiti…having multiple tattoos is not a bad thing, but very few individuals have the personal taste/style to balance it correctly…it’s just nice to see two guys who aren’t “ink-clones” having a sexy time and showing TRULY NAKED flesh… 😉
I see…so now not only is it unacceptable to criticize tattooing, it’s also forbidden to praise a guy for being ink-free. People express aesthetic preferences of all kinds, all the time, without it being a problem. What is so damn sacred about tattooing?
–lol–calm down, baby…nothing is forbidden in america, that’s why we need to intelligently choose which pressing cultural issues warrant proper attention…this little tit-for-tat repartee about body art is NOT one of them 😉
I would howl at the moon with him any night
Right, the “fad” that’s been around for thousands of years across cultures (many of which were ceremonial & had major significance). I agree that there are badly done tatoos, and that there are those that get them in haste, but it’s insulting to keep calling it “graffiti”.
There’s nothing wrong with criticizing anything in proper context. It’s the insulting, dismissive attitude that a lot seem to have about what someone else does to their body after generally making an informed decision. By praising someone for being “ink-free” one implies that having ink is somehow bad or not praiseworthy.
any respectful observation should be valued, but your initial response to the first commenter was rather caustic and THAT is what i reacted to…you can understand that…as for the “to ink or not to ink” debate, since getting tattoos seems such an overwhelming fad right now, i just think it feels more daring and sensual to be ink-free…that’s just my own opinion/observation, and i feel it has been kindly rendered…as i said before, there are plenty of guys who look great with their body-art, but more often than naught, there are individuals who go so overboard with the imagery that the feeling of true nakedness and sensuality of their otherwise amazing physiques seem compromised ( David Beckham, you sexy devil, i’m talking to YOU–lol–)… 😉
If I seem caustic, it’s because I have tattoo’s, and each has significance. Place yourself in someone else’s position (be it tattooed, pierced, dyed hair, etc) and deal with the *constant* string of insults about something that has not one jot of anything to do with you. As for it seeming to be a fad, once again, the practice of tattooing is several thousand years old, and spread across many cultures. That’s not a fad, that’s a tradition. I think we see more people with them (especially in porn where everyone is nude) because it’s no longer taboo.
Michel definitely wins the ‘I want to run my hands through your chest hair award’.
Special mentions must go to his A-mazing nipples and tongue.
Even though the tribal practice of tattooing has been around for centuries, it’s only been in the last 10 years that the art of tattooing has gone “mainstream” and more men and women have gotten themselves inked…I’m playful when I use the term “graffiti” because there ARE certain individuals who accumulate their body-art images with no sense of balance, theme or even decent illustration… Watch any episode of “Say Yes to the Dress” where a heavily-inked, prospective bride attempts to wear an elegant gown and you’ll see that fine piece of couture overwhelmed by the jarring images splashed across her breasts and forearms…Those are the moments when you can begin to see why some of this garish ink-work does its wearer a tacky disservice…
–lol–i’m not trying to insult you or anyone else who is a proud human canvas of ‘body art’…i’m just saying that when it’s done BADLY, it is a definite distraction from someone’s overall visual appeal ( Logan McKree, i’m talkin’ to you, baby–lol–)…
OK, I can see your point here, and appreciate it better. I feel that tattoos, well done, are things of beauty. I agree that tramps and attention whores get bad ink.